
Michael Lauer
American cardiologist
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
Aug 14, 2026
Purple Public Health episode—Research funding and incentives with Michael Lauer
43:32
43:37
43:43
43:53
44:06
48:46

Salma AbdallaHOST
So what's your read on what's happening in the moment and how does that connect with the history of how we got here?

Michael LauerGUEST
Well, to a large extent, it is a continuation of a longstanding debate as to who really should be in control.

Michael LauerGUEST
In the 1940s, the Democrats felt very strongly that the politicians should be in control and the Republicans felt that the scientists, they should be the ones in control.

Michael LauerGUEST
In the mid-1960s, President Johnson complained that the agency was spending way too much money.

Michael LauerGUEST
In the 1970s, there were members of Congress, I think at that time, Republican members of Congress, who said that they thought that members of Congress should decide each individual grant and which grant should be funded.

Salma AbdallaHOST
But do you think this is a moment where we can use to think about how do we restructure the system? How do we make sure that we don't create another misaligned incentive that might lead us to, again, being in a system that is full of bureaucracy and might not actually lead to optimal results that we're looking for.