I

mean, it didn't go maybe as smoothly as she would have liked.

So it was worth reading.

For good, bad, or otherwise, she is a leading voice for teachers' unions.

and it's always interesting to see what she has to say.

So I ordered a copy of the book when it came out and read a copy of the book when I received it.

And every book has that inside dust cover where you've got the author picture and a little bio promoting the author in the book.

What kind of precedent, if any, do you think this is setting, though, that a report that we put out that directly identifies that member dues were spent on something incorrect or erroneously, that it's now being taken seriously for this investigation? Do you think it sets a good precedent, a hopeful precedent for us going forward, or just putting a target on AFT that's deserved?