Yeah

... whether you're just, you know, coming across for a week or you've been here your whole life and born here, they try to count everybody because a lot of these, and it'll date back to the NGOs, there's a lot of funding that the government gives out as part of per capita grants.

So a lot of these cities and localities make sure to go count as many people as possible, and they don't care quite often if you're an illegal immigrant or a non-citizen or not, because the more people that they count, the more their states and localities benefit from funding.

So the Trump administration i- in the first term did a very good job of changing the policies, um, to counteract this, to make sure that we would not be counting ili- uh, aliens a- as part of this, which would come to visa holders, tourists, illegal immigrants, a- and the like.

But unfortunately, when Biden came in, he undid these on, on day one, which opened up, um, the 2020 census, which was done in 2021 and completed before the redistricting, to include every single person here, whether you have a legal claim to be in America or not.

And they did that because, you know, the Biden administration has a, a pact with these open borders advocates, these NGOs, these people that want to flood the country with open borders of every single person all across the globe.

Because it's, it's a win-win to their ... and a power grab to the political base.

How long would it take to actually find out how, how many illegals are, are on, are on the census, and therefore, how many not, not to count?

It does say the word persons, but I think there's more to it than that, right?

There's a lot more to it.

And this comes back to on the 14th Amendment.

It had to do with who was an inhabitant and who was not.

It's not just who is here.

It's really who is an inhabitant as part of it.

covering the political community.

What are the implications of that?

So how do these tapes change the legal dynamic around Biden's mishandling of classified information?

Well, it's a much bigger bombshell in this release than what we anticipated.

Uh, the information disclosed confirms that, uh, Joe Biden, after leaving office, was willingly, knowfully- knowingly retaining and disclosing classified information to his ghostwriter.

And what's key to understand that are the redactions.

Normally, we would complain about the number of redactions, but here, the redactions confirm under the B1 standard that redactions are for classified information.

So every time there's a blank in the audio or redaction in the transcript, it is a confirmation that Joe Biden released classified information, national security, or DOD information to his ghostwriter, and he knew he was doing this.

And this wasn't just accidental like Hur led us to believe when he was special counsel.

Does this new information, uh, really change the way we look at Biden, or does this just confirm how we already understood his presidency?

All right, I guess first question, your response to listening to these tapes.

Well, it's a much bigger bombshell than anyone anticipated.

This confirms not only two things, that Biden had significant classified information that he gave to his ghostwriter, that he knowingly and willingly did it, that he kept the classified information at home, but it also confirms that Biden's cognitive decline can be traced back to as early as 2017.

He was not all there.

As you play in the opening, he was very confused.

He had good days and bad days.

This is not an isolated thing that only occurred at the end of his presidency like Jake Tapper and CNN would like you to believe.

Marshall,