So I

had taught, I think, a seminar twice on law and robotics in which the approach was sort of a fairly standard tech law class where it was really robots and or AI and.

So AI and the First Amendment, AI and copyright, AI and torts.

When we three sat down to plan out what this book would look like, and it wasn't 10 years ago, but it was three years ago, we had some initial conversations about how to think about textbooks or casebooks.

And we agreed we did not want to have a casebook that was AI and, we wanted to have more methodological rigor than that.

And we also agreed, and this I think Dan, you probably have thoughts on, that we didn't want to have our students get mired down in heavy, complex regulatory framings and language just at one point in the course and be stuck in that for the rest of the course.

So with that in mind, we tried to break the casebook up into parts that would have these arcs where we'd have cases, we'd have case law, we would have statutes.

Well, I'll actually, Margo, your thoughts.