Well, the plausibility structure has told you that in a number of ways because we've been socialized rather than being these logical beings.

Sure.

I break down, um, the question so plausibility is really about like why would i believe this right so like and why why would i lean into this and why would i walk in this direction say when i define apologetics i would define it as engaging the why question like why would i believe why would i take jesus seriously as an option for my life you know why would i follow him so it's not the what simply the what you know that includes that but it but it's why would i do it's not break that why down into into three, well, four categories really, but I'll give you three of them.

The first is plausibility, which I use slightly different than Berger does to mean the question, is it true? The second question is desirability.

Is it attractive? Is it beautiful? And the third one is tangibility.

Is it real? Which is different than the question, is it true? And then there's a fourth one that we can talk about in a minute if you'd like.

But if we think about plausibility, desirability, tangibility, plausibility tends to be established for you.

but