I think it's a very strong thing to do.

Changing one's mind after reviewing the evidence is a good thing, provided it's an evidence-based decision.

I was against a ban for almost exactly the reasons that you've highlighted.

In other words, banning in some ways is making it easier for the social media platforms not to worry about safety by design, which is really what we want, is safety by design.

And again, this is another race.

My kids are in their 30s.

One of them went to Cambridge when Cambridge was the only university outside the US that used Facebook.

And I just wanted to draw you upon that because I sometimes think that as timely as that publication was, there is a risk that things published by religious leaders are alienating to people outside of that group.