Is that an accurate way to look at the letter?

I, I think there's two parts.

Um, uh, and I, I understand there's some, uh, you know, editors in various newspapers who are, find things laughable.

I don't find things laughable when I think the law has been violated and/or the law hasn't been followed, as in my case with school construction and how things occur.

Um, and so, um, I, I guess I'm gonna say to you the two parts are, one, uh, a pardon, and then two, if not a pardon, uh, a review of the, of, of the ca- of what's going on through the US Department of Justice, uh, in B- in Todd Blanche's, US Attorney, uh, Todd Blanche re- having it reviewed on what's going on here.

I suppose a third would be, it would've been ideal if it was a mistrial, and w- in fact tried the case over again, um, using school construction law and, um, what needed to occur.

So maybe there's three parts to it.

Mm-hmm.