Uh, Bridge to Home program.

Bridge to Home.

I'll mention what Bridge to Home is, and maybe I'll bring up a different example where I think the design is a big part of it.

So Bridge to Home is a city-funded initiative to essentially provide transitional housing or temporary housing for people experiencing serious mental illness and also have a lot of kind of emergency department or inpatient utilization related to their psychiatric condition.

And this was one of those things that honestly was years in the making with the city where, you know, we have a lot of resources dedicated towards serving patients experiencing homelessness and with serious mental illness, and the city also has, like, you know, identified it as a high priority area.

So we got together and repurposed a lot of resources to provide housing for fifty, now one hundred individuals on an annual basis to help them find permanent housing.

I would say that's a win for public sector innovation in a way.

And Kevin, what do you wish provider inventors knew or you could provide them before they came knocking on your door?

Let's talk about any other aspects of the SDM market in general, or do you want to talk more about the whole group home phase out?

Yeah, let's talk about the group product phase-out.

So it's been about six months since we had that last conversation.

It might be a bit longer, but Paramount's been really, really busy in the last three months as an SDA provider because we've been working with...

Majority of the group home operators that have done SIL, when I say group home operators, they're the SIL providers that have been delivering their services with the Victorian government in their housing over the last 10 years.

So there are so many people and participants that are currently residing in the group home.

So just revisiting the stats, there's about 600 enrolled participants.

A little more information on that would be really useful.

Well, what does this mean? How truly significant is this moment, seeing as how it's been very turbulent in terms of whether or not a ceasefire can hold, whether or not Israeli troops will move out of Lebanon? what is the significance of this? Is it actually binding? I

see.

I think I'd like to focus a bit.

I mean, it's significant for US ties with Iran, yes.

But the bigger issue, I think, is what it means for the US in terms of credibility.

No matter how US officials are going to try and dress this up, it's a very stunning capitulation to an adversary that US leaders had previously insisted was, you know, on the ropes, on their last legs.

Yeah.

Yes.

trade policy right now?

So I'd say the strategic significance of the tariffs outweighs the economic significance of exactly how much is being levied.

When Trump's first round of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, IEPA, was overturned by the Supreme Court in February, he instituted a temporary 10% tariff under Section 122, and those are expected to expire on July 24.

The Section 301 tariffs are, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, meant to bring tariffs up to the level that they were last year.

Now, unlike the IEPA tariffs, these Section 301 tariffs, they can't be announced at the drop of a hat.

There must be a detailed process that involves hearings, investigations, before they can be imposed.

However, as a result, these tariffs that come out of Section 301 investigations have a lot more legal certainty, and they're less likely to be overturned by a future Supreme Court decision.

investigation?