What are the arguments for and against?

Yeah, well, Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers, put this on the ballot.

It's a two-part argument.

First of all, California is home to a lot of super wealthy people who have the capacity to help finance social programs.

And in this case, the overwhelming share of the revenues would go to healthcare programs in the state to fund those.

And I guess the second part of the argument is that As a result of some cutbacks in federal spending on healthcare, the state will feel a pinch in that area.

And so this would be a nice opportunity to sort of do a one-time tax on super wealthy people to help shore up funding for healthcare.

So if those are passed, would that then actually negate Prop 40? What would happen? If all three passed.