They all think of themselves as the good guy who knows better than everybody else what should be done.

What I believe is going on is that these people have genuine concerns.

When you go and you see a talk from Stuart Russell, who's a respected AI scientist, when you hear Hinton considered the godfather of, I guess we're supposed to say SI now, let's say it's AI, I don't know.

But let's say Hinton, who is the godfather of AI, saying that if you don't have maternal and paternal instincts in the AI, we're setting ourselves up for massive problems.

When we have real scientists that have real concerns, that's where the source of a lot of this messaging is coming from.

Now there's also other people with other agendas, I get that.

But the point is, is that this affects everyone.

But those are the types of things my, my prompt to the people in the room was, okay, let's take, like, we spent a lot of time today talking about, do we agree on the same ideology and verbiage of in the, in the states of the world? Um, if we can make that happen substantially quicker, then we can have more conversation that's focused on what do we actually take as next steps together and how do we hold each other accountable in that process?