How do we prioritize?

Yeah.

Well, I think that for the European Union, the idea has to be, and I was trying to allude to your industrial policy question, Andrew, there has to be a protective and defensive element in there, but very targeted.

So we don't fall into, this is China, that's security, that's closed borders, you know.

That makes us complacent, that makes us internationally not competitive.

So we have to sort of really get scientific about this and find where's the damage, how big is the damage, and then act upon it, you know.

I think Europe has done a good job in 2024 in September by outlining what kind of stacked up subsidies the EV cars had.

Where you think Europe should, I mean, is it the rare earths should be a little bit harder on really focusing in on EU self-sufficiency in certain areas? Anything you can point to there that you think differently about?

And I believe that the International Energy Agency have said that the West would need to invest something like $60 billion in order to produce rare earths to compete with China.

They would make it cheaper than the Iran war, so it should be feasible.

We have rare earths all over the place.

Yes, some of them have more in China, but our bottleneck is the refining capacity.

We lack the technology, and we lack the willingness to say, okay, a lot of nuclear waste comes out of this process, a lot of chemistry is needed, which is toxic, and it doesn't look well.

China accepted this, and that's why Inner Mongolia has these lakes of chemistry, which is polluting huge chunks of Inner Mongolia.

But we did not accept this.

Do they know that it's part of the process?