Skip to main content
John Vervaeke

John Vervaeke

Philosopher

Nov 5, 2026

SebastianHOST
8:40
And if you can, what exactly is the meaning crisis? What have we lost as a civilization?
8:48
So that's a multifaceted question because there's both a historical and a scientific aspect.
8:53
So I'll start somewhere and then I'll ask you to ask me further questions where you think you would like to follow this.
9:00
So the basic idea is Well, take the notion of biological adaptivity.
9:05
Biological adaptivity is an organism needs to be able to connect to its environment in the right way.
9:12
That's what adaptivity is.
9:13
It has to fit its environment.

52 MINS LATER

SebastianHOST
61:04
And where do you think this might be heading if you had to sort of draw some wild conjectures into the future, let's say 50 or 100 years from now, what becomes available for us?
speaker_1ADVERTISER
16:04
I
16:05
think I'll do the same.
16:06
I think it would put us on an equal playing field if I gave Dick some of my background and how I'm coming into this.
16:14
Right, I love that.
16:15
And I want us to be peers.
16:18
I want us to be peers in this.
16:21
So, peers and partners.

9 MINS LATER

25:45
And so I wonder if you might talk about that a little bit.
3:58
You know, is there anything that you would want to add about yourself?
4:03
Um, I guess people, if, if they don't know me, I'm an associate professor at the University of Toronto in psychology, where I teach cognitive courses, cognitive psychology and cognitive science.
4:13
I've been the director, the associate director, the assistant director of the program.
4:17
Uh, so I have a long, uh, uh, long history with that program.
4:22
Um, in psychology, I do work on intelligence, rationality, wisdom, meaning in life, and, uh, uh, mystical experiences.
4:32
In cog sci I do work on, as Darius said, relevance realization.
4:36
It's connecting connections to predict- predictive processing.

18 MINS LATER

10:49
So how do you see that? relationship
10:53
well first of all let's uh you and i both and if we need to we can go into detail we think that relevance realization is primordial uh you and i are also on the same page it's we think it's even deeper than sort of this framework of predictive processing it's it's has to do with this is some of the work i've done with dan chiappi that fundamental orientation that makes any predictive processing possible.
11:16
And so we're talking about something very primordial.
11:18
And I think that means, and I want to say that because it's clear that Heidegger is talking about care in this primordial sense.
11:26
He's not talking about it like in, you know, You know, the way I sort of care about ice cream or something like that, at least not initially.
11:32
Because it is, as you say, it is bound up, and this is why it relates to the meaning crisis.
11:37
It's bound up with the fact that we are the beings for whom being is in question.

58 MINS LATER

69:51
How do we hold that tension if all is nothing?
EvanHOST
28:14
It exists in some way, or does it fall out of the physical world?
28:21
So let's take this idea of constraints and let's take it very seriously.
28:27
This is the work of Alicia Uraro.
28:30
So if I push a cylinder on a table, why does it roll? If we're Newtonian, we think about the initial event and then the events that come from it, and we say that's why it moved, because my finger hit the cylinder and then the cylinder moved, energy was transferred, et cetera.
28:48
But of course, a lot of other things have to be the case.
28:51
The table has to be flat.
28:53
The cylinder has to have the shape it does.

24 MINS LATER

EvanHOST
53:08
What are your thoughts on that approach?

Unknown podcast

Ep.624 ~ There’s Nothing Better Than That - John Vervaeke - Jordan B Peterson ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 23 · 6m

2:23
So s- fill me in.
2:24
Well, that's what I'm trying to get at.
2:25
I'm trying to get at that power is a way of, you know, when, when, when your shot is true, your skill has been effective a- and y- and you're gonna hit the mark, right? But, but, uh, but presence is also a way in which things are, are true to form, right? A- a- a- and then care- the, the participatory knowing is when we're, like, the, the deepest sense of true, which is, you know, related to trust and, and being betrothed to, to the world in an important way.
2:53
The...
2:54
So if you'll allow me to expand what you mean by true to cover all of those dimensions-
3:41
Sophia adventure?
3:43
I think everybody is...
3:47
Uh, how can I put this? Everybody lives from the, the, the non-propositional kinds of knowing emphasized by Plato, and that's what all of s- the scholastic research is pointing to now.

Unknown podcast

Ep.602 ~ Exodus ClipWhen You Confuse Yourself With God ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 21 · 4m

3:01
Right, right, right,
3:02
because that's the alternative.
3:03
Well, that's a scary, that's a very frightening thing if it's real.
3:06
And the lack of embedding is what is ripe for manipulation, right? Because you can move, this is what we're seeing with sort of mob-like mentality throughout the culture across the spectrum because you can move people like a school of fish because they're not embedded in something.

Unknown podcast

Ep.530 ~ You Wont Believe This About Bees ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 15 · 12m

1:35
It's a s- it's a great starting place.
1:38
Uh, it, it occurs...
1:39
I don't know if this, this analogy is, is appropriate, but I think what you're describing is the changing of the, the sort of dyna- dynamic moving of the boundary between order and chaos as you proceed down the level of specificity from the general to the specific.
2:02
So, so, so actually what's happening there is, is the... it's the same thing as the antibody, is the, the, the boundary is moving.
2:11
The boundary's getting closer and closer to the target.
2:15
And, and I think-
3:18
Random, yeah.
3:18
They, they, they don't know where the flower beds are.

Unknown podcast

Ep.500 ~ How Perception and Emotion Shape Our World ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 12 · 7m

1:02
Affordances.
1:03
Right, exactly.
1:04
Okay, so what do you think of Gibson's ideas? I think most of them are excellent.
1:11
I've been writing about affordances for some time, and what I think Gibson was weak on is he didn't talk about how affordances are actually tracked in the brain.
1:28
He sort of threw up his hands about that and said, the information is in the light.
1:39
Well, yeah, but how does the information in the light get into our heads and do what it does? That's the part that he was weak on, but we're making great progress on that today in the neurosciences.
6:06
So you can actually conceptualize both emotional systems from an entropy perspective.
6:12
I think this is fine.
TiagoHOST
79:23
So, so h- how, how can we navigate this space?
79:25
That's a really, that's a really important question.
79:28
Um, I'll try and do different dimensions that you touched upon.
79:32
Um, well, you mentioned that peo- people criticize me.
79:34
I get criticized from both sides.
79:37
Uh, the atheists hate me and a lot of the theists hate me.
79:40
Um, I've turned that around to being a heuristic for generally guiding me, uh- That's-- So I've turned that into, I must be doing something right.

16 MINS LATER

TiagoHOST
95:53
So my question to you is, like, how are you trying to not fall prey to that, and what do you think you have been doing well to avoid that trap? And what do you think that maybe you can improve on, or maybe certain experiences in your journey where you felt that, "Actually, I did that, and maybe that wasn't so good, and I need to self-correct"?

Unknown podcast

Ep.441 ~ Immanuel Kant and the Rise of Postmodern Thought ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 8 · 10m

1:34
And then that's Kant, I think, if I've got that right.
1:37
Right.
1:38
Well, the postmoderns will use both of those strategies, the anti-empiricist strategy and the anti-rationalist strategy.
1:44
And what's important about Kant, right, is that Kant is integrating, right, both of those anti-strategies.
1:50
So in the generations before Kant, the skeptical arguments about perception, right, directed against the empiricists.
1:57
The empiricists want to say everything is based on observational data.
2:01
But then if you don't have good answers about hallucinations and relativity and illusions, right, and so forth, then it seems like your structure, your intellectual structure, whatever it comes to be, if it's all based on probabilistic or possibly faulty perceptual data, then the whole thing is a tottering mess.
7:17
And that's a nice set of constraints, and it seems to me that that, at least in some part, goes a long ways to answering the objections to the limits of the scientific method that have been discussed, that were discussed, and that you just discussed, that have been discussed historically and that you just summarized.

Unknown podcast

Ep.396 ~ Why Did Jesus Get Baptized- The Gospels ~ Jordan B Peterson

Aug 1 · 18m

speaker_8UNKNOWN
7:30
Mm.
7:30
Can I ask this question? For Christians, what does that mean to you to have somebody proposing a ritual that's-
9:36
Because the, uh, yeah, yeah, yeah
9:37
...
9:37
I, I wasn't talking about the baptism by John of Jesus.
9:41
I, I think, and even the ritual baptism, I, I, I appreciate what you're saying about its psycho-spiritual capacities for transformation.
9:47
I'm trying to...
9:48
Like, this seems to be an, i- i- it...
19:58
... conceive of as entropy, as very similar to what he's saying or in psychological terms or?
20:05
Um, well, the way we...
20:07
I mean, the problem, part of the difficulty is the historical naming of a thermodynamic principle and an informational principle with the same term, and they don't mean exactly the same thing, but they're not totally disconnected, so it's very easy for people to confuse those two together.
20:28
Um, so we didn't...
20:31
I mean, at some level something like the free energy principle is trying to... is directed towards entropy in the thermodynamic sense that Robert is talking about.
20:42
Um, and then you, you, you understand part of the function of autopoiesis is to, uh, dissipate entropy, um, in, uh, uh, in a way that, you know, uh, allows for the, the longevity and, of the, of the individual, the propagation of the species, et cetera.
21:02
Um, but what we concentrated on is we concentrated on the idea more about something like the mutual predictability between events, mutual information, uh, which is much a better measure when you're trying to, uh, see if there's something going on, uh, you know, cognitively in the brain.

1 HR 5 MINS LATER

86:19
So you're tilting human action away from non-productive coercive activity or, or protective, if you want to use the nice framing of it, towards productive cooperative activity.

Unknown podcast

Ep.342 ~ The Antidote to Temptation ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 29 · 7m

speaker_4UNKNOWN
3:22
It's all conflated.
3:25
Well, I think picking up on that, Stephen, the way I'd answer you is I think something is very powerfully being modeled there, like I say.
3:34
I see Jesus using the sacred text to move to a more encompassing perspective that makes him more oriented to what is more real.
3:44
And that is something we can emulate.
3:46
We can do the same thing.
3:48
We're locked in this situation.
3:49
We can step outside of our egocentric autobiographical thing, go to the sacred text, look at our situation from that perspective and be called to something beyond ourself.
Stephen BlackwoodMODERATOR
5:46
Yeah,
12:09
The forum is yours.
12:11
Yes, thank you so much and thank you for that very gracious affordance.
12:17
So I would agree that we have a meta crisis, as you indicated, we have an interlocking set of crises and we seem incapable of formulating these crises in a way that gives us any tractable purchase upon them.
12:34
And then the proposal I'm making is because there is a deeper crisis that is basically thwarting us.
12:41
It's thwarting us in two ways.
12:43
It's basically hamstringing our cognition, our ability to make sense.
12:50
And it's also limiting us in terms of our capacity to be motivated to make the serious kinds of changes that we would need to make to address the metacrisis.

21 MINS LATER

33:39
Could you address these, please?

Unknown podcast

Ep.229 ~ What Is he Word - The Gospels ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 17 · 13m

4:35
So one way of looking at this is to say, well, In the source, there was the word, i.e., to say the Trinitarian reading, although that sounds like an absurd Christian interjection of a much later period, you could see that as making perfect sense with just these initial words.
4:54
John? Yeah, I want to pick up on the fact that there's actually, I call them the four L's about God.
5:03
There's love, agape.
5:05
There's logos.
5:06
There's light and life.
5:07
And these are all the identity claims that are somehow circling.
5:11
And I'd like to propose we slow down a little bit because the familiarity of those terms to us, I think, is masking something more profound going on here.

6 MINS LATER

11:26
making a meta-scientific claim.

Unknown podcast

Ep.197 ~ Why The Gospels Matter in 2026 (More Than Ever) ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 14 · 22m

18:41
Mm-hmm
18:41
... and that therefore our relationship to it has to be primordially relational.
18:46
Th- and this is very, very hard for our w- way of thinking because we have got into the mode, and for all kinds of historical reasons we don't need, uh, of thinking of, and, you know, uh, and, and it, uh, uh, that what there really is are individual things.
19:02
There's no relationality.
19:03
This is, of course, nominalism.
19:05
All that's in our head, and then that gives us a dualism 'cause the mind has the patterns, the world...
19:10
There's, a- and there's something going on here in these, in this language, and I, I, I wanna slow down a little bit and get at...
20:01
Mm-hmm.

Unknown podcast

Ep.195 ~ The Highest Can Be Found In The Lowest ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 14 · 16m

7:59
Mm-hmm.
7:59
Right? You can resolve it.
8:01
A- but the thing here is w- we're, we're trying to do the, the kind of play, but we're not just playing again with...
8:07
I, I, I keep on a- hammering on this.
8:09
We're not playing with i- just identity.
8:11
Sorry, we're not just playing with concepts.
8:18
Mm-hmm.
8:19
And, and, and, and the reason why that's important, uh, and I'll shut up in a sec [laughs] right, is we're, we're talking about transformative experience here.

Unknown podcast

Ep.194 ~ THIS Is Why We Celebrate Christmas ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 14 · 28m

speaker_5UNKNOWN
7:11
But they also are trying to move along at a pace that human comprehension can possibly keep up with.
7:17
If I could just pick up for a second on something, Dr. Peterson, you were saying about, uh, motherhood.
7:23
It's very interesting here, the pattern that is emerging.
7:26
You know, the angel, an angel comes to both, uh, both, uh, in both situations, uh, to, to prophesy the birth.
7:33
And, and in one sense, you know, pregnancy is one of the great examples of fulfillment of nature, right? It's, it's, it's the actualization of the potentiality for, for motherhood.
7:44
And yet, you know, that fulfillment in both cases is, uh, is a radical self-othering.
7:49
Both of these sons will, will, will die brutal, brutal deaths.
speaker_5UNKNOWN
9:17
He gives his, you know, like in a way-

Unknown podcast

Ep.192 ~ Understanding Judas ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 14 · 29m

speaker_5UNKNOWN
15:28
Mm.
15:28
Can I, can I add a dimension to this? 'Cause you're, uh...
15:32
Many of you, and quite rightly, are focusing in on the political dimension.
15:36
But there's a dimension here that speaks to me quite personally.
15:39
This is actually a teaching instance.
15:41
He's teaching, and this brings up the issue that Zach Stein has brought up.
15:46
He's brought up the whole question, my friend Zach Stein, of teacherly authority.
16:38
Mm

Unknown podcast

Ep.167 ~ Dantes Inferno Might Shake You To Your Core ~ Jordan B Peterson

Jul 11 · 11m

6:30
T- can you tell me about that?
6:32
Uh, so it's been demonstrated in the work of Stephan and Dixon.
6:35
It's, it's very complicated, but what you can do is you can use, um, sort of state space math to translate, uh, like, where somebody's looking or pointing a finger into, uh, like, a, a measure of the entropy of the cognitive processes that are producing the orientation.
6:52
It's, it's...
6:53
The, the math is well-established.
6:55
Um, a- and-
8:19
Yeah.
8:20
So the, the th- one of the things, you know, uh, Kaplan and Simon found that was predictive of insight is a thing they called the notice invariance heuristic, which is what you have to do when you need an insight is l- so the advice we give people isn't actually the best advice.
12:24
I think that's a very fair point to start on that.
12:28
I want to build on what Thomas said, and I think it's an excellent provocation, by the way, Andrew.
12:36
So modernity is built out of the criticism of the vertical relation between the natural and the supernatural being absurd, because no communication or causation can go that way.
12:46
And so we will understand the natural in its own terms, and it is real on its own terms.
12:52
And then this, of course, makes a problem of how do you deal with the one and the many? How do you deal with all of the appearance reality? And how do you deal with normativity? Where's the true, the good, and the beautiful in all of this? And so what modernity does is replace that vertical dichotomy with a bunch of horizontal dichotomies.
13:10
The subjective objective, the inner, the outer, the is-ought, analytic synthetic, the meaning, the measurement, and they're all just variations on the same thing.
13:19
And to make a very long story, which I do do in detail elsewhere, the last 400 years of philosophy has, I think, ground to the conclusion that that horizontal dichotomy is just as absurd as the vertical.

11 MINS LATER

24:27
It's so alien to modern readers or hearers.
30:15
I wonder if you could maybe sketch in a bit more detail the kind of philosophical and historical developments that led to the meaning crisis.
30:23
crisis.Um, so I, I think what I, I would wanna do, uh, is to talk a little bit more about what we mean by meaning and what its relationship is to truth and before we could answer that question well.
30:41
Uh, because I think as long as we keep certain notions as presuppositions unchallenged, the attempt to talk about myth is going to be hamstrung by all these undisclosed and unquestioned dichotomies.
30:53
Um, and, uh, so that, uh, if you'll allow me, I wanna address that first.
30:59
Uh, uh, and so, [clears throat] I wanna get clear on what I think I'm talking about when I'm talking about meaning.
31:06
Um, and I pref- I prefer to use the, the Latin word religio which is one of the candidates for the etymological origin of, uh, re- religion, religare, which is also ligament and debi- the notion of binding, um, is what I wanna make a reference to.
31:22
And I wanna start with something that sounds like it has nothing to do with religion or myth at all, which is your intelligence, your making sense ability, your sense-making ability.
speaker_5UNKNOWN
34:59
Hmm.
48:36
Yeah.
48:36
And, and I think what that does is...
48:38
And, and this is what my proposal, what I think existential conscience is, as opposed to pathological psychological conscience.
48:46
Existential conscience is to realize our correct attitude, our correct c- comportment towards the fact that reality shines in intelligibly, but it also withdraws in mystery.
48:58
And I think that, and this is Plato's central argument, which I just...
49:01
Sorry.
49:02
I had a really sort of powerful realization that this is...

53 MINS LATER

102:15
Okay.
43:49
Mm-hmm.
43:49
And that therefore our relationship to it has to be primordially a relational th- and this is very, very hard for our w- way of thinking because we have got into the mode, and for all kinds of historical reasons we don't need, uh, of thinking of, and, you know, a- and it, uh, of that what there really is are individual things.
44:10
There's no relationality.
44:12
This is, of course, normalism.
44:13
All of that's in our head, and then that gives us a dualism, 'cause the mind has the patterns, the world ...
44:18
There's, a- and there's something going on here in these, in this language, and I, I, I wanna slow down a little bit and get at, right? These terms are very familiar, and I think that's ...
44:30
I understand what ...

15 MINS LATER

speaker_10HOST
59:26
Yeah.

Scroll for more appearances

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.