Hey, everyone.

Many of you saw my video a few days ago humiliating a loser creationist named Jay Dyer.

Well, his idiot fans weren't too happy about it, nor was his partner in pointlessness, a guy who goes by Jim Bob.

What do you suppose he decided to do about it? Let's find out.

I was prepared for Jay's idiot followers to throw a tantrum in my comments section, without finding the courage to watch the video, obviously, but I was not prepared for the level of stupidity they displayed.

It's truly breathtaking.

... uh, developed, right?

What we're doing is we're identifying this structural, uh, this, this spectrum of, of, uh, of complexity, of whatever organ or system, whatever you're talking about, and we're populating it with all these instantiations of more and more complex.

I'll pause your time.

Sorry about that.

Can you guys, can you stop doing that? Here, hold on a second.

There you go.

I'm getting too many super chats.

Sorry, it's interrupting my opener.

Okay, so what we got from Grayson is a half of an opener about me and creationism, some insults, some ad homs here and there.

then we'll get into the super chats if you guys have questions comments um tos appropriate please all right go ahead

So whenever you're ready, the floor is all yours.

Okay, the topic of the debate is evolution.

Evolution is on trial, which means there's got to be a defense of it, and there has to be an affirmative of evolution.

Now, I want to point out that in the opener, my opponent actually described what it is to communicate science.

She got into what she finds scientific and what's considered scientific science.

what's considered the scientific method, and so forth.

Nowhere in the opener did she actually give an affirmative or a defense or a justification for what evolution is other than describing or defining changes in allele frequency.

Let's let Jim Bob respond to some of that.

Jim Bob, the floor is all yours.

All right, cool.

Yeah, the debate's about evolution.

I'm glad that my opponent mentioned onions so much in his opener, 'cause his opener stunk pretty much like onions.

[laughs] Um, the process, evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the Earth.

Some people call evolution merely changes in allele frequency, but as we heard in the opener, um, if there's a change in allele frequency between myself and my son, and I observe it, the person I call my son is still a human.

Uh, all induction leads to the conclusion that even though there could be changes between parent and offspring, what doesn't change is what they are, which is human.

Floor is all yours, Jim Bob.

All right, go ahead whenever you're ready.

All right, cool.

The debate is evolution, about evolution.

It's about the defense of evolution.

It's about affirming evolution and all of its, uh, trinkets.

Um, evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.

Evolution is touted as the single most well-established scientific theories in human history.

Two to four, yeah.

Yeah

... of the truth of knowledge as opposed to what's practiced.

I always ask these guys, "What do you practice?" It seems like the practice is more propositions about the thing you believe, and that's pretty much it.

Like, there's no sacramental life.

There's no liturgical reality.

And I think, um, when you c- when you criticize this stuff from a Christian, uh, perspective, Orthodox Christian perspective, what you said before is so important that, uh, that Christ, uh, literally takes on form in, in the world, not just metaphorically, not just spiritually, not just symbolically.

And if you only take the symbolic and re- reject the literal, you c- you actually can't make sense of most things if you...

But you'd have to understand paradigms and presuppositions for that to make any sense.

Jim Bob, I will start your five to 10 minutes whenever you begin talking.

All right.

Thanks a lot.

Uh, so in order to know if evolution is compatible with the Bible, we're gonna have to know what evolution is, and we're gonna have to know at least one core assumption in regards to what is claimed in the Bible.

I heard a couple in the intro that I'm fine with going with.

Uh, let's go with evolution first.

Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from early forms during the history of the earth into, uh, the current forms today.

... three, four minutes

amount of time if you'd like uh you don't have to use the full amount but i'll start the timer for your opening the moment you start talking like the video guys appreciate all y'all in the chat going crazy

Okay, thank you so much.

So yeah, I want to first say that if you guys were listening to the opener, it actually sounded more like a job interview than a case for evolution.

What we heard is a lot of assertions that people believe evolution is true.

We saw a lot of myopic views on studying genetics locally and what happens inside the body.

Well, I'm not really concerned with what happens currently inside the bodies of people select categories of animals, I'm looking at what the claim of evolution is.

One, first and foremost, the claim is that evolution is a scientific theory.

this paradigm doesn't work, what is modern cancer research? What am I doing each week in reading if this is a completely ridiculous fiction that doesn't work? How does any of that work? What is a blue whale genome and what does it tell you if it doesn't? tell you anything about its past present and all

So the media's portrayal of these ridiculous stories, turning them into, you know, daytime soap opera drama, I think was very perceptive.

Yeah.

And that's very alive and well now.

I mean, making the murderer is probably at least the more recent famous case where it was it was it was actually about media.

Like it was like the media is the character also in the in the documentary.

And it also shows the media's view of.

Man woman relations, these kind of themes, they're they're constantly in a tug of war of like, when do you like the man? When is the man good? When is the woman evil? And these kind of kind of a tug of war of of when you're when you're supposed to love the man and make him good.

I am basically your life coach CIA handler and you're going to do what I want.