are the rates for the general pop?

I honestly do not know because there's so many different studies out there, and it's significantly higher.

And I do a lot of work in this area when we look at autism, brain injuries, ADHD.

and FASD.

And collectively, if you look at those four groups, and those four groups all are neurodivergent conditions.

Basically, the rates are multiple times higher than the general population.

So when you study this topic, I found it helpful.

group, you don't want to belong to a group that's not healthy, of course.

in modifications to the gut microbiota which may partially contribute to the higher incidences of chronic inflammatory inflammatory disorders such as cardiovascular disease obesity depression allergies diabetes and auto immune disorders yeah that sounds like the modern western diet yes sir

And if you're asking yourself, well, again, how could the gut be related to crime in some cases? Well, there's not a lot of literature out there yet, but there's a few studies, a few articles now that are really talking about Maybe appreciate your client's gut health more.

That could be a targeted area for intervention.

So this is a really lovely article I frequently cite.

It was published in 2020.

Dietary interventions, the gut microbiome and aggressive behavior.

Definitely add that to your reading list, folks.

don't know jared this uh probably a lot of the listeners and everyone else out there we gotta watch this stuff carefully i

That's just my thoughts on it so far.

Absolutely.

I believe, like we talked about in part one, this field can be complemented by all kinds of other fields.

So in part one, we talked about neurocriminology.

So hopefully all of you have a good basic understanding.

Part three, we're going to talk about nutritional neurocriminology and use the Dan White case, the Twinkie defense.

as kind of the case study.

this yeah here that that particular example jared i mean if we have the fine if we have I'll keep using the word physiological because it's general enough, but if we have evidence to the effect that someone has that trait, they are high-risk behavior, they're sensation-seeking, couldn't that potentially lead to an increased sentence? In other words, it becomes not a mitigating factor, but an aggravating factor because they feel they won't be successful in any kind of rehabilitation program or on parole.