Am I right, or am I missing something?

So transference is a terrible term for a wonderful phenomenon, and let's talk about it in a little bit, but let me answer your question.

So yes, indeed, it turned out that in a very short time when that happened, When my patient was able to relive, essentially, her traumatic experiences that had been walled off by dissociation for years, the horror of it went away.

But what didn't go away was the low self-esteem that she had.

And so it dawned on me that there were two therapeutic processes going on here.

There were two healing processes.

One was trying to deal with the low self-esteem, which was really hard and slow, and dealing with the trauma, which was much more dramatic and took a long time to get there and a lot of work to get there.

Yeah.

Do you see that movement where you actually have somebody in power that at least gives lip service to, you know, health? Is that, uh, connected at all with the GMO movement?

Um, RFK Jr. knows about glyphosate.

He was one of the attorneys in the, in the team that defended Lee Johnson, who was the first person to sue Bayer Monsanto for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma due to using Roundup.

And, um, I know that, uh, Robert Kennedy Jr. is aware of the details.

He's aware of the data.

He had to learn it f- to be part of the, the team.

Um, I've met him.

So we just have a couple minutes left, and I, I wanted to ask, o- one, once you eat this stuff, is, is there stuff that stays in your body, and, uh, how do we- How do we detox ourselves from, from all of this stuff and, and, and avoid the health ramifications of it?

Have you seen, you know, especially considering what happened over the last few years, have you seen the movement growing? Is it stagnant? Are people wanna put their head in the sand? What, what are you seeing with regard to building a, you know, a, a response?

So, you know, the heyday was about 13 years ago, Prop 37 to get it, you know, um, labeled in California.

Then we had labeling battles for the next two years in different states.

There was, we had 117 different local organizations with over 10,000 activists that we were supporting.

Um, it was a big deal.

It was new.

And then the, um, biotech industry nixed state labeling, um, kind of caused a big depression in, uh, in the, in the local movements.

Can they be labeled organic in the United States?

Here's a better way to find out about gene editing.

Go to responsibletechnology.org and invest six minutes and look at our animated journey into the DNA to see what happens during gene editing.

It's called "Seven Reasons Why Gene Editing is Dangerous and Unpredictable," and it's just six minutes, and I highly recommend it.

Please share it.

But the industry convinced the governments to look the under-- the other way, pretending that gene editing is safe and predictable.

So, for example, a company that was producing gene-edited CRISPR mushrooms sent a note to the USDA and say, "Do you need to look at this?" And the USDA said, "Nope.

Deaths from Alzheimer's, very tightly correlated with GMOs and Roundup.

Death from Parkinson's, same thing.

Dementia, deaths from senile dementia, ADHD, anxiety, schizophrenia, suicide by overdose, autism in six years old, six-year-olds.

Now, this autism chart, this chart is different than the others.

They didn't just use one year of glyphosate, like looking at the amount of glyphosate in a particular year compared to the disease rate of that year.

They added all of the glyphosate from the previous three years.

when they got to be 25% of their body weight they were euthanized or killed because they considered it to be inhumane I think feeding glyphosate to the rats was inhumane here's how they work here's how it worked Monsanto would feed rats 33% corn for 90 days and say oh the rats are fine they would ignore changes that occurred in their physiologies either they wouldn't talk about them or they would say they were not they may have been statistically significant but they would say they're not biologically significant or not treatment related now if you're reading that and it's published in a peer-reviewed journal you might think oh it's not biologically significant or it's not treatment related But if you talk to an actual good scientist, I say, there's no such thing.

You look for statistical significance and then you isolate why that may be the case.

So all of these different problems they were having in their 90 days, they would just ignore it.

They would ignore it, but they would also do things like they compare rats that were fed Roundup and Roundup ready crops.

And then they would compare them to controls were eating a diet of rat chow purchased from the market which had roundup and gmos so their feet they were not really had they didn't really have a good control group or they would change the statistical methods making it really hard there's all sorts of ways that they rigged their research and we've caught them red-handed so one very brilliant toxicologist dr g e saralini from france he was reviewing all of the submissions to france as well as to the eu and he looked at roundup ready corn and there was always more than 50 different statistically significant changes in the physiology of the rats that suggested serious problems could be happening later in their lives after the 90-day cutoff So if you know about Monsanto, as I say, they try and get scientists fired, lose funding, discredit.

So Seralini secretly raised the money for a study and did a study on a group of rats that were fed Roundup Ready corn.

You could.

Okay.

No, during this quantum sleep, we don't try to bracket.

We don't try to notice.

It's like, it's a different technique.

But it's a good impulse if you have a headache, people can, you can clear headaches with bracketing.

And I've cleared people's headaches with bracketing.

or the

but if you sprayed it on wheat it would kill the wheat it doesn't kill it instantly it first dries it down so what they do is they spray it on wheat three to five days before harvest it dries it down then they harvest it makes it easier to harvest it also causes the the ripening to happen very quickly so it's used especially in in higher longitudes when it's more northerly, when it's colder because they want to speed up the ripening before it gets too cold.

They also end up cleaning all the weeds for the next season when they grow in the spring.

It's very convenient for farmers and it's sprayed on the grains and it's sprayed on the legumes, the beans.

It's in wheat, especially in oats, It's in mung beans and lentils and chickpeas.

So no more hummus because that's made of chickpeas unless it's organic because that stuff is soaked in Roundup or glyphosate-based herbicides.

Here's celiac disease.

We're empowering ourselves to figure out how to get out of this corporate stronghold that's choking us to get back our health, laughter, and life.

I thank you, Michelle, for bringing up the energy and vibration, because I'm now writing a book on quantum consciousness and how it can transform and heal.

And in another lecture that I gave for this conference, i talked about the the some of the physical transformational aspects of this it's not just um wishful thinking so when i've been tested when i apply quantum consciousness to someone who has eeg sensors on changes their brain waves instantly the moment i i put my attention on it and then when i stop it changes again and this is something that everyone has capacity to do and also how we have our consciousness changes our own, not just our brain waves, but also the chemicals that function inside us.

So that's why I say if you end up eating GMOs, you're getting exposed, don't worry about it, but not just don't worry about it.

I mean, you make your changes, but actually enjoy life and feel that it's your responsibility to your health.

to be happy, to be upbeat.

And there's a lot of things in the news right now that people are addicted to reading, and then they have a reaction like this, and that's not good for health.

Thanks, Ann Temple.

But they also patented it as a biocide antibiotic listing all these different bacteria that it kills.

And it turns out in a chemical waste dump near their factory, they found bacteria that wasn't dying in the presence of glyphosate.

So they figured, great, let's put it in the food supply.

So they took the gene out of that bacteria that allowed it to survive and put it into soybeans and corn and canola and cotton and sugar beets and alfalfa, creating Roundup ready crops.

But it turns out that the glyphosate, which is in the crops because it goes into the crop and then it gets concentrated into the food portion and we eat it.

it still is an antibiotic so it's still killing off the microbiome inside us and as you can see in this slide in bees poultry rat zebrafish cows earthworms as well as humans now there was a study done where they took a fake human gut, a simulated human gut, which you can see in the picture, and they fed it first.

i love that guy because he eats great greek olive oil good job john back there

so um monzento had a consultant But they hired a consulting company and it was the precursor to Arthur Anderson, I think.

And they then asked Monsanto executives, what's your ideal future in 15 to 20 years? And the Monsanto executives said they want to genetically engineer 100% of all commercial seeds and patent them.

And then the consultant company worked backwards from that goal to create the strategy and tactics to achieve it.

They reported that conversation in a January 1999 San Francisco biotech conference.

And my friend who was there said it was the most, uh, was one of the worst, most horrible things he had ever heard anyone say.

And then the afternoon, it got worse when another company circulated a white paper projecting a 95% replacement of all commercial seeds within five years.

So

That was always number two.

So here we have 85.2% of the people saying they got better from digestive disorders, 60% from fatigue, obesity or overweight 55%, brain fog 52, mood problems like anxiety and depression 52, food allergies and sensitivities 50, memory and concentration 48, joint pain, etc.

We're going to go over this a few times.

Because right now it's just a random list right now it's just individuals reporting they're getting better from things and there's a lot of confounding variables.

If someone switched to non GMO to they also go off of processed foods to they also start working out, I mean there's there's it's not a strong survey on its own, but it becomes part of the data that we've collected now.

I'm going to look at the number one response, and that is digestion.

In the movie, in the film, Jeffrey, that you made Secret Ingredients, for those who haven't seen it, what is one key takeaway message regarding GMOs and health?

Well, I made the film with Amy Hart some years ago, and we show it to audiences and sometimes we ask them to rate themselves how vigilant they've been or what percentage of their diet is organic.

And they'll rate it one to 100.

And then before the end of the film, most people have already made a commitment not only to change their own percentage but to get show the film to other people who are suffering from some of the diseases that the people in the film are suffering from and got better when they switched to an organic diet there's one family of five kathleen di chiara and her and her husband and three sons they had 21 chronic conditions between the five of them And they did all sorts of things in their diet, took out gluten and soy and commercial dairy and a number of things.

And the impacts of those chronic diseases reduced, but they were still managing the diseases.

When they switched to organic, all of them went away very quickly.

One of the sons was autistic and had trouble speaking when he was younger.

Why is this a more significant concern with GMOs compared to other forms of agricultural modification?