Here's his argument.

I think what I take away from that event is that that you know by default when AI is being developed by centralized companies then they're developed in this kind of corporate form that is highly susceptible to government pressure you know the way that companies can raise capital Etc Etc I think what this event highlights for most people is that their access to AI is at will.

It's at the pleasure of big private companies like Anthropic and OpenAI.

They're going to be public companies soon, but nevertheless.

And the win with the government.

And this applies to every person in the world, because when this happened to Anthropic, the downstream effect of this government order was essentially like a global shutdown.

Jake conceded the point and then answered it.

Absolutely agree.

Yeah.

It requires, um, coordination among agents.

So we've seen this amazing example the other day from Eigen Labs where Google, uh, put out this paper about quantum circuits, and they said, "Look, we c- we're now so much closer to solving with a quantum computer when we, when we get there, you know, breaking ECDSA encryption.

And so we're...

Bitcoin, you're on notice that, you know, you're gonna get hacked very soon, as soon as this happens." And so they advanced the state of the art.

But what they said was, "We're not gonna tell you what the scientific innovation actually is.

We're gonna censor it.

Their goal is to get as much adoption of this, of this, of their training network to get the inference revenue.