What do you think?

Yeah, I, I was the same as you.

There was a lot going into this coming from both sides.

Very obviously you have a lot of people trying to frame it as if they're just allowing abortions for any, any other case that a woman might want up until birth and that they're okay with that.

And where I do think that that a lot of people on the left probably do hold that position.

That's not exactly what was going on here.

So as you said, the old law had a line at, uh, 24 weeks and then specific exceptions beyond that, which would include the life or health of the mother as well as severe fetal diagnoses.

Right

specifically

I tend to focus a lot on like geopolitics and the war and between Israel and Hamas and things like that and the war in Iran and I mean Jesus Jesus his heart hurts whenever he sees war.

God's heart is hurt when he sees war because he sees the divide of humans and human nature and the flaws and how it's led us down these bad paths to the point where we're literally taking what is most sacred and that is life.

Life is all we have.

When a person is killed in war, it's a tragedy, but it's a reality of history.

It always has been.

and finding the balance between how I could be a Christian who is loving of people, and I want all people, whether they're a communist who wants to kill people, or a radical jihadist who wants to kill the infidel, the unbeliever, who they believe is inferior to them, I want all of them to come to Christ.

I mean, is there like, is there, what do you think is going on? Well, specifically Candace Owens, what do you think, why do you think she's doing that? Or why do you think she's going in down this rabbit hole per se?

There is a country that has been threatening to use nukes if they ever got them, and that's the country he seems to like very much right now.

Right, and that's also the country that lied about their, uh, capacity or the threshold that they were enriching uranium, multiple attempts to block IAEA inspectors from, uh, accessing their facilities, uh, IAEA multiple reports saying, "Hey, it's above, um, civilian use." It's all they've claimed.

We just want it for civilian use.

No, they don't want it for civilian use.

Uh, they've very clearly passed that threshold.

But in terms of the, uh, nuclear opacity of Israel, 'cause that's what it would be called, if you actually want Israel to be safe, you have to think about incentives and worst case scenarios, not just these slogans of, oh, they, they threatened to do this multiple times.

When have they done that? Again, I would ask Tucker, when has Israel said, "We're gonna use a nuclear weapon"? The only thing that they could ever refer to is probably the Samson Option, and there's a lot of context there.

... earlier just on the demographic side, but do you think sort of ideologically do they have a way out of this?