Mm.

You can't bring those two things together.

So that's how Harry needs to start fixing it, and the second, the, the other thing is to stop being so chippy about his personal victimhood.

He needs to get over that and grow a pair, as they say in the UK, and just move on, because I think that, that narrative has died a death now.

Nobody's listening to it.

Now, with Meghan, it's a similar thing.

Decide your lane, get into your lane, and go with it.

How would you fix As Ever?

So what do you think that Harry's statement against Justice Nicklin, what do you think that that is going to do when it comes to

damages? I think that was a very poor decision, but a decision they made, I think, quite deliberately.

A lot of people say it's hot headed, but I think they had a little bit of notice.

And I think that they wanted to put the pressure on about this previous court case that Judge Nicklin filed.

had had to settle with Harry previously when he was the barrister for the miracle many years ago many many years ago but that's what they intimated and they also accused him of a whitewash which is a cover-up which is almost being a criminal um so I don't think that that was a very clever thing to do with the man who's about to decide your damages fate And I don't think he's going to look very highly on it at all.

But the interesting thing is he has shown himself to be a judge that makes his judgment according to law and according to the evidence that served up to him.

And the Daily Mail, quite emotional as you say, are going to go for the jugular because they're going to go for their litigation conduct.

So do we think that this was on purpose? Do we think that Harry will make the most of it for himself? What are you hearing?