I mean, what is your take on that? Whether that's a good idea based on what we've seen even from the Australian experiment?

It's not only a bad idea, it's one that makes very, very little sense.

And I've spent some time this week just trying to understand, you know, why? Why is this the option that Starmer went for? We all know about the Australia ban, which was, I think, in the winter.

And there's been a raft of evidence showing that the many ways that it hasn't worked.

And that's about circumvention.

That's about teenagers losing access to information and socialization.

There's the obvious fact that you're not actually fixing any of the problems with these platforms or these algorithms or the speech or the ad tech in the first place.

But what are the effects of that going to be on kids' education and understanding of the world around them?