How do the dynamics that Ana Maria has described in Venezuela play out in global decision-making spaces? And why don't advisory boards and consultations go far enough as mechanisms to genuinely shift power to communities affected by displacement?

Thank you, Sarah.

Yeah, I just also want to mention that my point of view and perspective will also come from different identities that I hold on top of being a co-secretary general of Avon, which is a very fancy title.

The fact that I was born as a stateless person and the fact that I'm also a human rights defender, I had experience of being displaced as asylum seekers and refugees and doing... a very grassroots-led movement that is very underrepresented and hurt and unwanted in many ways in our country context, and it's not a very welcoming community.

Under the securitization of particular minority group in the country context, I just want to add as a heads up, if there's different perspective coming up, The role that I am now involved as a co-secretary general of APRAM, it is quite a relatively fairly big network founded in 2008.

We have now 360 organizational and individual members across 29 countries in Asia and Pacific region.

It is fairly diverse.

How can this power be meaningfully shifted when donors still have the final say over where resources are allocated?