Do you mind discussing this and how you've been involved in the constitutional litigation?

You're right, I am an affiant in the Hack case.

In fact, the Hack case was the first case off the mark after the bill was enacted.

It had been in preparation for several months, and they were getting affidavits from people who would be affected.

I should say right off the bat that most of them are from Muslim women, because they are clearly the primary target of this.

I was asked to contribute one.

I'm an Orthodox Jew, and they wanted to, uh, show the breadth of the impact.

In regards to the arguments, but also your practice of litigating constitutional cases, how is this different than other charter cases that you maybe have been involved with in the past?