So, you know, with all of that in mind, what types of evidence bring strength in the application? What does a strong application look like from an evidence perspective?

I think that I always say there's two sources.

There's the therapy's evidence and in our work, almost always occupational therapists, oftentimes occupational therapists supported by other practitioners, that is the lead provider of an assessment with relevant conclusions.

So therapy's evidence, and also evidence from the person and people who support the person.

So non-therapy's evidence, and I'll talk a little bit about that.

And also numbers that I mentioned before, letting the agency know what it's going to cost, because that's a really important consideration for the scheme, including sustainability, like we've been hearing relevantly so much about recently.

So the therapy's evidence shows for SDA specifically considers those criteria that can only be provided by experts and particularly occupational therapists in our work.

Like how do we marry together the value for money thing? Because I'm sure it's a dance that you have to dance very accurately to get a successful application.