Skip to main content

Graham L. Hamilton

Graeme A. Hamilton is a partner at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Toronto and national co-leader of its White Collar Criminal Defence & Corporate Investigations Group.

Oct 11, 2026

speaker_1MODERATOR
136:44
Graham Hamilton.
136:50
Thank you, Chief Justice.
136:52
Clearly, the question of, uh, in that province is the key question, as, uh, Justice Roe, uh, just stated.
137:03
There is also, though, a question of what is it that needs to be in that province.
137:10
And this is a critical question as well, because when you look at the definition of a lottery scheme, uh, it is possible to look at a lottery scheme on a, uh, uh, at the level of the individual poker game, for example.
137:28
It's also possible to look at a lottery scheme as being the broader framework.
137:34
And just as 2071A provides an exception, or Section 207 generally, but 2071A specifically provides an exception to the prohibitions in 206, when it comes to conducting and managing a lottery scheme, once there is a lottery scheme that is, that is conducted and managed under 2071A that's properly within, uh, uh, the exception of 2071A, then my submission to you is that individual games that are carried on within that framework, uh, are, are lawful under that exception in 2071A.
Malcolm RowePANELIST
142:48
Isn't that really the difference?
Richard WagnerMODERATOR
136:44
Graham Hamilton.
136:50
Thank you, Chief Justice.
136:53
Clearly, the question of, uh, in that province is the key question, as, uh, Justice Roe, uh, just stated.
137:03
There is also, though, a question of what is it that needs to be in that province? And this is a critical question as well because when you look at the definition of a lottery scheme, uh, it is possible to look at a lottery scheme on a, uh, uh, at the level of the individual poker game, for example.
137:28
It's also possible to look at a lottery scheme as being the broader framework.
137:34
And just as 2071A provides an exception, or Section 207 generally, but 2071A specifically provides an exception to the prohibitions in 206, when it comes to conducting and managing a lottery scheme, once there is a lottery scheme that is, that is conducted and managed under 2071A that's properly within, uh, uh, the exception of 2071A, then my submission to you is that individual games that are carried on within that framework, uh, are, are lawful under that exception in 2071A.
138:17
And so there's a question, there's been a lot of focus in, uh, the submissions this morning on the issue of the individual poker game.
Malcolm Rowe
Malcolm RowePANELIST
142:48
Isn't that really the difference?
Richard WagnerMODERATOR
136:44
Graham Hamilton.
136:50
Thank you, Chief Justice.
136:52
Clearly, the question of, uh, in that province is the key question, as, uh, Justice Rowe, uh, just stated.
137:03
There is also, though, a question of what is it that needs to be in that province? And this is a critical question as well, because when you look at the definition of a lottery scheme, uh, it is possible to look at a lottery scheme on a, uh, uh, at the level of the individual poker game, for example.
137:28
It's also possible to look at a lottery scheme as being the broader framework.
137:34
And just as 2071A provides an exception, or Section 207 generally, but 2071A specifically provides an exception to the prohibitions in 206.
137:48
When it comes to conducting and managing a lottery scheme, once there is a lottery scheme that is, that is conducted and managed under 2071A, that's properly within, uh, uh, the exception of 2071A, then my submission to you is that individual games that are carried on within that framework, uh, are, are lawful under that exception in 2071A.
Russell BrownUNKNOWN
142:48
Isn't that really the difference?

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.