Some Latin.

Yeah.

Some...

Throw some Latin into the discussion.

The que- It's interesting, the question is it brings me back to the, the path we had with cyber, which is obviously where I spent a lot of time, five years at Cyber Command, and, and actually working cyber issues earlier when I first met General Shanahan when he was the J39, and I was working on the joint staff and supporting him.

These are relatively, I think, unique capabilities in the sense that they are multi-domain cross-cutting capabilities that touch everything else in, in varying ways.

And they raise a lot of challenging fact patterns, and challenging fact patterns a- in, at speed.

I said, "Hold on."

And I don't even know if that's a distinction with a difference anymore, but I would welcome hearing from you about what legal structure would govern in which situation, if there is one, and what enforcement mechanism exists for that legal structure.

So, yes, I mean, it's sort of a paradox.

Just the whole concept of deception, which these technologies lend themselves to.

We start talking about generative AI and the ability to create false content, which there's discussions about maybe requiring watermarking or other things that show the truthfulness of the content that's generated.

But by and large, that's not the case right now.

Deception in normal circumstances is, let's just say, legally frowned upon, right? I mean, in domestic legal structures, there's all sorts of legal consequence for using deception.

Not entirely.

And I wondered if you see any other ways to manage this under the law of