How significant is this?

I think there's a couple of comments to make about the significance of the change.

Firstly, it's significant simply from the fact that we haven't had this kind of restriction on non-compete clauses in this country in the past.

Secondly, the significance of it will more be seen at the low to mid-income earners.

Obviously, that's who the protections are intended to protect, given that the high income threshold applies.

we've seen the rhetoric from the government in the lead up to the proposed change around hairdressers, for example, being subject to non-compete so they can't go and work at another hair salon after they leave their employment.

Obviously, you know, that garnered a lot of kind of public support for those kind of changes because what is the business interest you're trying to protect in preventing somebody from earning a income in their field of expertise.

What's the situation here? Yeah.