So talk us through what you took and maybe the reasoning behind the selection.

Sure, yeah.

Very different to the Manchester list and the whole thought process behind it is very different as well.

Essentially it was, well, six Titanics, four and a half bigs.

So double errant.

Valiant, Gallant, and two all DACA, Destriers, Destriers, however we want to, the War Horse of the Imperial Knights, which was pretty crazy.

And I'd love to say that, like, this list was concocted off of my fantastic anti-meta brain, and it really wasn't.

Are there any others that we need to talk about?

yeah

and but i didn't actually take take any of the the admex stuff at all it was still just a pure knights list um looking at taking hold and the way it played i was like actually 20 OC that can scout, that can sticky, that is on 25 mil bases.

So it's really quite easy to benefit from the hidden rule because you can put four or five on that center objective and still be hidden behind that wall.

And then a load of high OC, high toughness stat checky knights, even though, as we say, sometimes knights can still blow over.

I was like, okay, I think there's something here.

So I had the core kind of fundamental of the list, and I wanted two units of Skitarii, and that was going to be center and expansion.

And taking hold, if I lock down my expansion and if I can dominate the middle, then I don't really need to worry about their expansion as much and actually can just play on kind of two-thirds of the board from a kind of width perspective.

So it's tough.

Let's go.

Absolutely.

So I believe every Knight list at the moment needs access to something that can go to ground.

I think the way the mission plays, the way a lot of armies have good elements of speed...

Like, just sticking a big knight onto a central objective turn one opens you up to a world of pain.

And armages, in my opinion, are too easy to shift, or you just out-OC them six.

So...

Okay, how does your list play its disposition?