Anything about those facts, support, any theories that you have on the holdout? I mean, what do you make of this whole holdout situation?

Well, well, first of all, I would just say that just because there is a holdout and 11 people viewed things one way and one juror views things differently, it doesn't necessarily mean he was wrong.

I'm not saying he was right, but he just did definitely take a different perspective than the other jurors now.

For example, our understanding of where his perspective is coming from comes largely from the other jurors on the panel who are speaking out.

He has not spoken out to the public.

So really, it is their perspective of his views that inform what we know about this situation.

But honestly, this case really was not a whodunit, but why it happened.

We'd love to hear your thoughts.