How close can your technology with EEG get to a clinical assessment?

You can get 75% accurate, which is far above the level of chance.

It is definitely better than random, but it's also Well, I would still just go ask this person the questions if I needed to do the answer.

There has been a line of people trying to convince that we can diagnose diseases with that.

And I think our idea of Firefly is that's probably not the best thing to do.

Let me jump back to the beginning of the story where I talked about being on the Human Genome Project, because there is an analogy there that I like to use, which is when we were working on the genome, Cancer was generally diagnosed and discussed and categorized based on where in your body cancer happened and what it looked like.

So you had liver cancer or you had kidney cancer.

When I go to sleep listening to a podcast, maybe some of it's getting in.