How did Moldova experience this? Is the veto problem undermining the EU's credibility? Or do you consider other areas of enlargement methodology revision to be more important?

First of all, I would like to say thank you for inviting me and indeed the best timing in terms to have this conversation today.

Regarding your question, indeed, just I would like to recall that the Republic of Moldova had a few European Council conclusions reconfirming that we are ready to advance from all the 27 member states to advance on opening all the clusters and also to advance on the next steps.

And Moldova is delivering.

We are delivering on the homework and what is required for the association process, but also on all the other dimensions of the growth plan and different other commitments.

And indeed, as Pernil and Funda have been mentioning, this is important for the credibility of the process also back home.

And it's very much picked up by the ones who doesn't want us to succeed in today's in order to make the counter-argument on that.

How do you see that playing out and what should you be doing about it? Moldova been through a lot.