Uh, it looks very good for the MEC coming into this season.

Uh, you're right.

And, uh, you really start with that Frostburg State team coming off of a conference championship, coming off of, uh, an appearance in the Division II playoffs.

And I'm starting my preparations for this season.

I've been following, uh, these teams and, and what they have returning from a year ago.

And that Frostburg State team, man, they're not gonna miss a beat.

They've got their top three rushers back.

Hmm

But when did like insurers and the financial markets start to pay attention to this as a, you know, opportunity or, you know, area that needed some attention?

Yeah, exactly.

So it's, it's kind of always difficult in the sense that, you know, insurance products ensure financial losses and sometimes they specify the cause, sometimes they don't.

So potentially we could have had cyber losses covered by traditional policies, be it property insurance.

A few companies tried to argue that electronic data was property and somehow in the cyber incident, they damaged the electronic data.

Therefore there was coverage under the property policy.

But kind of over time, those traditional insurers just argued like, no, we don't cover cyber incidents.

And I'm just curious from what you're experiencing and seeing how often is that still? And does that impact their insurability, their ability to get a payout? Have you done any sort of correlation between number of security staff and, you know, ability to get insurance or get paid out after an incident?