Skip to main content

Dana Warren

Deina Warren (transcribed as "Dana Warren"), Director of Legal Affairs at the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities and constitutional/religious-freedom lawyer who argues before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Oct 12, 2026

Richard WagnerMODERATOR
155:27
thank you very much Dana Warren.
155:36
Good afternoon, Chief Justice, Justices.
155:38
The Joint Intervenors Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities' key concern in this case is preserving the autonomy of religious associations to make purely religious decisions as affirmed by this court in Wall and Aga.
155:53
to that end i will make two points first compelled disclosure of confidential purely religious decisions contrary to religious conviction has a severe impact on religious groups and second restraint toward purely religious decisions is well established this case simply raises a new context First, compelled disclosure of confidential, purely religious decisions to a state official is a severe infringement on religious freedom and autonomy and is markedly different from Hutterian Brethren, with a negative impact related to a wish to obtain driver's licenses.
156:28
Religious and spiritual decision-making, however, is not a wish.
156:31
As Justice Rowe, you observed earlier this morning, these decisions go to the heart, the core of a religious organization.
156:39
In Local 401, it was of utmost significance that PIPA prohibited the use of information for expressive purposes related to labour relations and that are at the core of protected expressive activity.
Richard WagnerMODERATOR
155:28
thank you very much Dana Warren.
155:37
Good afternoon Chief Justice, Justices.
155:39
The Joint Intervenors Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities key concern in this case is preserving the autonomy of religious associations to make purely religious decisions as affirmed by this court in Wall and Agha.
155:54
to that end i will make two points first compelled disclosure of confidential purely religious decisions contrary to religious conviction has a severe impact on religious groups and second restraint toward purely religious decisions is well established this case simply raises a new context First, compelled disclosure of confidential, purely religious decisions to a state official is a severe infringement on religious freedom and autonomy and is markedly different from Hutterian Brethren, with a negative impact related to a wish to obtain driver's licenses.
156:29
Religious and spiritual decision-making, however, is not a wish.
156:32
As Justice Rowe, you observed earlier this morning, these decisions go to the heart, the core of a religious organization.
156:40
In Local 401, it was of utmost significance that PIPA prohibited the use of information for expressive purposes related to labor relations and that are at the core of protected expressive activity.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.