D
Dana Warren
Deina Warren (transcribed as "Dana Warren"), Director of Legal Affairs at the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities and constitutional/religious-freedom lawyer who argues before the Supreme Court of Canada.
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
Oct 12, 2026
John Vabuolas, et al. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, et al. (41816)
R
155:27Richard WagnerMODERATOR
thank you very much Dana Warren.
D
155:38Dana WarrenGUEST
The Joint Intervenors Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities' key concern in this case is preserving the autonomy of religious associations to make purely religious decisions as affirmed by this court in Wall and Aga.
D
155:53Dana WarrenGUEST
to that end i will make two points first compelled disclosure of confidential purely religious decisions contrary to religious conviction has a severe impact on religious groups and second restraint toward purely religious decisions is well established this case simply raises a new context First, compelled disclosure of confidential, purely religious decisions to a state official is a severe infringement on religious freedom and autonomy and is markedly different from Hutterian Brethren, with a negative impact related to a wish to obtain driver's licenses.
D
156:31Dana WarrenGUEST
As Justice Rowe, you observed earlier this morning, these decisions go to the heart, the core of a religious organization.
D
156:39Dana WarrenGUEST
In Local 401, it was of utmost significance that PIPA prohibited the use of information for expressive purposes related to labour relations and that are at the core of protected expressive activity.
John Vabuolas, et al. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, et al. (41816)
R
155:28Richard WagnerMODERATOR
thank you very much Dana Warren.
D
155:39Dana WarrenGUEST
The Joint Intervenors Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and the Canadian Centre for Christian Charities key concern in this case is preserving the autonomy of religious associations to make purely religious decisions as affirmed by this court in Wall and Agha.
D
155:54Dana WarrenGUEST
to that end i will make two points first compelled disclosure of confidential purely religious decisions contrary to religious conviction has a severe impact on religious groups and second restraint toward purely religious decisions is well established this case simply raises a new context First, compelled disclosure of confidential, purely religious decisions to a state official is a severe infringement on religious freedom and autonomy and is markedly different from Hutterian Brethren, with a negative impact related to a wish to obtain driver's licenses.
D
156:32Dana WarrenGUEST
As Justice Rowe, you observed earlier this morning, these decisions go to the heart, the core of a religious organization.
D
156:40Dana WarrenGUEST
In Local 401, it was of utmost significance that PIPA prohibited the use of information for expressive purposes related to labor relations and that are at the core of protected expressive activity.