We've been trying to nail this down, but do you have an estimate of how many people live in RVs in Seattle right now?

We have estimates that I believe are inaccurate.

So I'm also going to take one really big step back to say that this legislation is on types of vehicles.

So it's not designed for people who live in their vehicles.

What we are doing is we are creating very clear regulations about types of vehicles based on their size.

And simultaneously, the city has absolutely failed at providing any type of service for people who live in their vehicles.

Our city right now relies on two contracted outreach contracts to do all of the services for our city.

So is $5 million enough to create an effective system here?

How would voters feel if they're asked to basically raise taxes to pay for Ballard, which was already promised in the SD3 tax package?

Well, we can't use Sound Transit 4 revenue to pay for Sound Transit 3 projects.

We can, like we used in Redmond, where s- Redmond was a Sound Transit 2 project that had a very bad date associated with it.

It had gotten pushed out very far, and we used Sound Transit 3 to bring that date closer.

So we cannot pay for Ballard with ST4, but we could bring it closer.

The best part in my mind there, though, is with ST4 and Ballard, is we have to keep going.

We have to get back up to Northgate, Greenwood, Crown Hill, send that train to Bothell.

Like, this is something that it sounds like you're gonna continue to really be pushing for and, and not take no for an answer.