Yeah, can you please expand further on that? Because Beam was acquired by Modern Treasury for a reason, right? And what did Beam have that kind of set you guys apart compared to the market at that time?

Yeah, I think our... thesis was that stable coins represented a huge, hugely powerful technology, especially when coupled with instant payment rails, which is a thesis that I think is still being validated by the market and is also something that we're exploring a lot of while at Modern Treasury.

So to give you a bit more detail, the first thing that we did at beam that was novel and i believe we were the first psp to do this in market um is that we connected performant blockchains and both stable coins and cryptocurrencies on performant blockchains to visa's instant payouts capabilities uh to start with their push to card capability um which is now a a capability that's seen in market especially uh in kind of large b2c and neo bank like platforms that are out there And then we also expanded that capability to connect stablecoins into the US RTP system, effectively enabling like an instant cash out experience.

From there, saw some early traction with, as I said, some of the kind of early movers in the B2C kind of global neobanking realm that has emerged in the past several years.

And then we also kind of broadened our aperture, so to speak, to service various B2B use cases.

And we became what's now known as a stablecoin orchestration platform.

Then I guess as it relates to the overlap with Beam and Modern Treasury, I think it's important to set some context for what Modern Treasury historically has done.

said U.S.-centric. Is it U.S.-centric from a customer-based perspective, but is the usage also U.S.-centric as in people are, you know, on-ramping into a digital asset and then are they sending payments out or are they actually doing use cases that are applicable to the U.S. only or to the U.S.?