
Dan Ho
William Benjamin Scott and Luna M. Scott Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, specializing in AI policy, administrative law, and antidiscrimination law
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
OCT 19
OCT 26
Jul 31, 2026
Best of: The future of AI and the law
26:53
27:02
27:10
27:17
31:13

Dan HoGUEST
Uh, there have been these, uh, incredible efforts, including by one of our own, uh, Stanford alums, Peter Henderson, to track all instances of legal hallucinations in cases.

Dan HoGUEST
We have, you know, uh, over 140 of documented, um, instances where there are filings with, uh, uh, legal hallucinations.

Dan HoGUEST
Those are, of course, the instances that are really gonna raise the eyebrows, potentially lead to judicial sanctions and the like.

Dan HoGUEST
But the more general question you're asking about open versus closed, I think is such a central one for the innovation ecosystem.

Russ AltmanHOST
What i- what is the future of a general purpose legal chatbot that could give people quality legal advice?