What is the main element that you say is questionable and should allow Lucy Letby to be retried?

Well, there are many strands to this, of course, but I think fundamentally, if you wanted me to point to the main one, the medical evidence that was used in court is now known to be, I think the most generous way that I could describe it, would be highly unreliable.

Um, there are other explanations available that simply fit with the clinical picture of the infants much better, and they're much more logical.

And I should emphasize as well that these come from...

That there's now 33 experts ready to speak in defense of Lucy Letby.

Um, at least 14 of th- these experts are neo- neonatologists.

There are also multiple, uh, obstetricians.

Very hard to get a hold of

Mm-hmm

Mm-hmmShe's had 10 years taken out of her life and, and everything is pointing to there being no crimes in the hospital, which is what this expert panel have said.

We found no evidence of any crimes.

We found no evidence of any murder.

There, there are medical and sort of in- inherent conditional reasons i- in the baby- Mm ... for what happened.

Mm-hmm.

That there's no, there's no malfeasance here.

After all that you've researched, do you still have any questions that you wish you had an answer to?

Yeah.

And then it came down to a half a day.

So you get a call to go photograph somebody, and they want him with the family, they want him doing this, and they want a portrait, so basically everything is a staged creation.

You j- you can't work that.

But basically what you do is you, you set your mind out and you let the person know this is a controlled portrait.

Once you start telling the person, even in documentary photography, if I'm photographing somebody and he smiles, I don't want the smile As a photojournalist, you really can't even say, "Don't s-", you can't utter the words, "Please don't smile." You're now doing portraiture.

But there's other ways to get him not to smile.

Yeah.

Mm-hmm

... um, and tried to use this against her.

And this included a note that was presented in court as being a confession note.

Now, that was, I'd say, the most important thing for me, because I'm a writer and I, it's my job to understand and analyze language.

So when I was back in the kitchen on the day I heard about this, I heard about this n- I, I thought, "Right, I haven't heard any good evidence, so I'll go away and start looking for it." So very early on, I saw this note, this confession note, which is, it's not a letter.

It's just some scribbled writing on a green Post-It note.

And, and I looked at it, and I was like, "There's no chance.

Mm-hmm.

Mm.

And Dr. Lee, the Lee sign, uh, is used as a, as...

That's a diagnostic sign of air embolism.

That's named after Dr. Lee because he discovered it, and he just simply said, "Well, none of these cases are, are the Lee sign." No- And that is the only diagnostic sign of air, air embolism in terms of discoloration.

So an- anyway, to return to what I was going to say about Dr. Lee, he inter- You talked about him driving a horse and, horse and cart through the evidence, um, or through, through the cases.

Uh, he said to me, he exa- He's seen the n- medical notes.

He said to me, "There are multiple errors for every case." It's just basic...

Mm.