Skip to main content

Chris Freye

Staff scientist in the High Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos National Laboratory, using GC×GC and mass spectrometry to study explosive aging.

Oct 26, 2026

13:42
Would you be able to walk us through why lower pollution temperature matters so much when your analytes are explosives?
13:53
Yeah.
13:53
So the gold standard for explosives analysis for the longest time and still is LC, right? We don't have any issues with compounds breaking down.
14:06
on the column.
14:07
Now we do sometimes have issues with detection, with ionization in our ESI source or APCI source.
14:15
We can have our explosives break down.
14:18
And interestingly enough, I've actually seen explosives ionize themselves in an APCI source, which was really weird when you get with unnormal adducts.

5 MINS LATER

19:43
I'm curious to hear how that idea originated and what does it let you see that a separate oven aging study wouldn't?

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.