C
Chris Freye
Staff scientist in the High Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos National Laboratory, using GC×GC and mass spectrometry to study explosive aging.
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
OCT 19
OCT 26
NOV 2
Oct 26, 2026
Episode 84: Chris Freye (Los Alamos) — Chromatography, Chemometrics, and the Science of Aging Explosives
D
13:42David OlivaHOST
Would you be able to walk us through why lower pollution temperature matters so much when your analytes are explosives?
C
13:53Chris FreyeGUEST
So the gold standard for explosives analysis for the longest time and still is LC, right? We don't have any issues with compounds breaking down.
C
14:07Chris FreyeGUEST
Now we do sometimes have issues with detection, with ionization in our ESI source or APCI source.
C
14:18Chris FreyeGUEST
And interestingly enough, I've actually seen explosives ionize themselves in an APCI source, which was really weird when you get with unnormal adducts.
5 MINS LATER
D
19:43David OlivaHOST
I'm curious to hear how that idea originated and what does it let you see that a separate oven aging study wouldn't?