Carolina Parada
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
Sep 17, 2026
Carolina Parada on Gemini Robotics, Robot Data and Physical AGI
16:19
16:26
16:35
16:46
16:56
17:27
23:52

Brian HeaterHOST
What are some of the learnings from that world that were transferable to the robotics work that you're doing right now?

Carolina ParadaGUEST
I mean, like you said, some of it is the approach with which you see a problem and how you go about solving it.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
Certainly one of the things that I've learned with each one of them, and if you notice in each one of them, I was there trying to change the way the current community was solving the problem.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
So even when I started working on speech recognition, one of the first things that I introduced was how to use deep learning for keyword spotting, which at the time was done in a totally different way.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
So I think in most of these cases, I try to go at it from How can I learn this from data in a way that feels robust and resilient to noise? And also, how do I try to solve this without necessarily evaluating against the current techniques, but not just trying to do an incremental improvement on them? So it's perfectly OK to sort of start from scratch and remove the existing approach before anything.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
So in speech recognition, by the time that I was in that team, we were rewriting everything.
6 MINS LATER

Brian HeaterHOST
And I assume that that requires like... maybe like a significantly smaller model or a significantly smaller data set at least?
Introducing Gemini Robotics 2
5:18
5:41
5:45
5:53
6:01
36:13
Logan KilpatrickHOST
Maybe we can also talk about the arc to sort of get here and sort of obviously this is the second Gemini robotics model, but is there like other things that are like worth, like obviously Google's been doing a lot of robotic stuff, DeepMind maybe, I actually don't know, maybe also add a bunch of robotic stuff, but can talk about any of sort of the research and the arc to get sort of this launch moment.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
I think many of us have been here also for a while and have seen all these steps through.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
But yeah, I mean, we've always, from the beginning, like I said, we're really thinking about general purpose robotics.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
And so we've done a few iterations where we've brought robots sort of techniques that now are table stakes for the community.

Carolina ParadaGUEST
So for example, we first introduced like reinforcement learning to learning simulation, how to control whole robots, right? So you see a lot of robots today like dancing and doing acrobatics.
30 MINS LATER
Logan KilpatrickHOST
Any advice, and maybe I'm misremembering this, but I feel like we do have a bunch of customers who use the ER models who actually like... aren't robotics companies and they just happen to be in one of these like domains for like video audio spatial understanding or something like that i don't know if that's like a suggested path for for folks but i assume it's like those domains of like video spatial understanding where like the er model is like better on a bunch of these core benchmarks