
Caitlin Sullivan
Theatre director
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
OCT 19
Oct 19, 2026
How to build AI customer research workflows without losing the human touch
1:37
1:51
2:01
28:50

Nathan IsaacsHOST
How do you get from there to here, and what pulled you so deeply into this intersection of AI and customer insights?

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
I mean, you already mentioned a few of the sort of spaces that I've worked in or the types of teams that I work in, but I actually also come from a marketing background.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
I worked in advertising and marketing, and then I moved to UX design and service design, and then I had my first actual official user research role title, but I did, I did research in all of those roles.
27 MINS LATER

Nathan IsaacsHOST
I'm wondering a- as we build out these workflows, as we look at to see if and how AI can make things better, what do we hold back? What should we not automate?
#160 AI Customer Research: Why Designers Should Learn Claude Code with Caitlin Sullivan
21:31
21:39
21:46
22:17
22:41
22:52
32:51

Patricia ReinersHOST
Um, what is the next step? Maybe also the hand off to the, to the other department, right? We are not working in a bubble as a researcher.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
I think the next step that most people do is checking everything that came out of AI, [chuckles] to be honest.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
And I think this is really important because, you know, one question I get asked often is, how do we stop kind of triple-checking everything? 'Cause a lot of teams I've worked with who are, you know, very used to doing research and know how to do it well, whether they're designers or product managers or researchers, are still unable to immediately look and go, "This is right or wrong." Because especially if you're doing, you know, new work, you're not testing with old insights or old data files, you can't tell.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
Claude and all of the other large language models give you something that looks very confident, and they can be filled with so many issues, but who can tell what's right and wrong? So I think everyone is still where, let's say people fall into two camps, either overly trusting [chuckles] or really second-guessing everything and going, we spend, you know, a fraction of time getting the insights out now from the data.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
But we kind of eat all of that time that we saved back up because we kind of triple-check and compare exact details and data and the outputs.

Caitlin SullivanGUEST
So I think a next step is actually implementing a workflow where you have a little bit of an iteration process, and that doesn't have to be that you, you know, the human digs through every detail of what came out of Claude or other large language model.
10 MINS LATER

Patricia ReinersHOST
most designers don't work with GitHub, but I think it's, it's important to know.