How did things end up in this alleged murder plot?

According to the felony complaint, prosecutors allege that Gabby plotted with her father, Francisco Gonzalez, who's a successful attorney in Florida, as well as her former boyfriend, Kai Corddry, to find someone to commit murder.

Prosecutors say that Francisco, Gabby's dad, was the moneybags of this operation.

And then in early 2021, he transferred $10,000 to Kai for the purposes of hiring that hitman.

They say that in May of 2021, Kai signed up for a dark web murder-for-hire site under the alias LizardKing69.

And he asked for someone to kill Jack by, quote, whatever method was easiest.

And over the course of the next few months, prosecutors allege that he transferred thousands of dollars to accounts associated with the murder-for-hire site.

What happened?

How did things end up in this alleged murder plot?

According to the felony complaint, prosecutors allege that Gabby plotted with her father, Francisco Gonzalez, who's a successful attorney in Florida, as well as her former boyfriend, Kai Corddry, to find someone to commit murder.

Prosecutors say that Francisco, Gabby's dad, was the moneybags of this operation, and that in early 2021, he transferred $10,000 to Kai for the purposes of hiring that hitman.

They say that in May of 2021, Kai signed up for a dark web murder-for-hire site under the alias LizardKing69.

And he asked for someone to kill Jack by, quote, whatever method was easiest.

And over the course of the next few months, prosecutors allege that he transferred thousands of dollars to accounts associated with the murder-for-hire site.

What happened?

You know, it's a good question.

So what is the crux of this argument? Is there anything different from the last time he tried this?

There is, yeah.

So he's arguing that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was sane when she killed her kids.

What's different this time is that he's using what happened during jury deliberations to bolster his case.

He's referring to the foreperson's note, which stated that the holdout juror admitted to having reasonable doubt, meaning according to Reddington, that every single juror had reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case, and therefore, the judge should acquit Clancy.

Specifically, what is the lawsuit saying about David's mother, Colleen?

The lawsuit says that Colleen served as David's personal finance director who had control over his funds.

The lawsuit claims that she therefore facilitated the relationship.

Caitlin, before we get to the verdict, just give us a quick recap.

Absolutely.

So for seven weeks, prosecutors portrayed Larry as a man spiraling out of control as it became clear his wife was planning to leave him.

Now, obviously, one of the standout witnesses from this trial was a man who called himself a spell caster who said Larry paid him to cast spells on Maya to keep her close to him.

Then the defense countered that investigators had no physical evidence proving Maya was even dead, let alone that Larry had murdered her.

He's got another trial coming up, right?

Yeah, that's right.

He's facing another criminal trial for a gun charge.