
Brianna Chesser
2
APPEARANCES
2
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
Aug 18, 2026
Mushroom killer Erin Patterson's appeal explained
2:29
2:36
3:16
3:26
S
2:25speaker_0HOST
They were at the same hotel as prosecutors and a police witness.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
So we know in our legal system that not only does justice need to be done, it needs to be seen to be done.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
So my question here would be about what actually do the defense have? Do they have any evidence of a particular interaction that's compromised the minds of the jury? Have they obtained statements from witnesses about that? Is there more to what happened, or is this a philosophical argument that resulted as a result of a failure of logistical planning? I mean, there aren't very many hotels [laughs] so it was really quite limited.
S
3:08speaker_0HOST
It's being heard in the Court of Appeal.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
The purpose of this Court of Appeal panel is to review legal errors, assess procedural fairness, and to have a look at evidence admissibility.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
So we've gotta remember that they're not there to retry the facts, so it's gonna be limited in terms of what evidence can be put before the Court of Appeal and then what they can do with that.
Why the mushroom killer is back in court
9:02
9:08
9:16
9:28
9:49

Brianna ChesserGUEST
And you might remember that this is where people post death cap mushroom sightings, basically.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
That particular evidence was permitted to be admitted, and the defense is saying it ought not to have been admitted ever.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
Now, I think what the defense is really gonna be pointing to is that the prosecution couldn't prove that Patterson even was aware of that app or saw those notifications.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
[pensive music] Now, look, all of this sounds really quite particular and a little bit strange, but what the defense is saying is that by including this particular evidence, it enabled the prosecution to prove that there was a history of foraging or a pattern of foraging that didn't actually exist.

Brianna ChesserGUEST
What the prosecution was saying was, "Well, you know, Patterson foraged all the time, so she would know what a death cap mushroom was-
S
11:14Samantha HawleyHOST
Now, just remind me about that, because there was a concern about where people were staying during the trial.