B
Bozidar Spirovski
1
APPEARANCES
1
PODCASTS
012
DEC 30
JAN 6
JAN 13
JAN 20
JAN 27
FEB 3
FEB 10
FEB 17
FEB 24
MAR 3
MAR 10
MAR 17
MAR 24
MAR 31
APR 7
APR 14
APR 21
APR 28
MAY 5
MAY 12
MAY 19
MAY 26
JUN 2
JUN 9
JUN 16
JUN 23
JUN 30
JUL 7
JUL 14
JUL 21
JUL 28
AUG 4
AUG 11
AUG 18
AUG 25
SEP 1
SEP 8
SEP 15
SEP 22
SEP 29
OCT 6
OCT 13
OCT 20
OCT 27
NOV 3
NOV 10
NOV 17
NOV 24
DEC 1
DEC 8
DEC 15
DEC 22
DEC 29
JAN 5
JAN 12
JAN 19
JAN 26
FEB 2
FEB 9
FEB 16
FEB 23
MAR 2
MAR 9
MAR 16
MAR 23
MAR 30
APR 6
APR 13
APR 20
APR 27
MAY 4
MAY 11
MAY 18
MAY 25
JUN 1
JUN 8
JUN 15
JUN 22
JUN 29
JUL 6
JUL 13
JUL 20
JUL 27
AUG 3
AUG 10
AUG 17
AUG 24
AUG 31
SEP 7
SEP 14
SEP 21
SEP 28
OCT 5
OCT 12
OCT 19
OCT 26
NOV 2
NOV 9
Oct 26, 2026
Keeping Humans in Charge of AI-Era Defense with ESET
R
0:54Rich StroffolinoHOST
Why is this cycle a problem? It seems like, are we not seeing a symmetrical benefit to defenders here at the same time?
B
1:05Bozidar SpirovskiGUEST
And to dive right in, the simplest answer is that AI, we're already seeing this for a while now, essentially amplifies whoever has the cheaper feedback loop or the lower cost of being wrong.
B
1:19Bozidar SpirovskiGUEST
So what that means is criminals have a cost of being wrong, but enterprises or teams on the defense side have a lot bigger cost of being wrong on doing something or not doing something.
B
1:31Bozidar SpirovskiGUEST
A criminal can blast 5,000 phishing emails generated by AI, none of them succeed, oh well, let's try again tomorrow.
B
1:39Bozidar SpirovskiGUEST
we try to defend on something using AI or we try to fix something, suddenly costs us a lot more in terms of time, of effort.
8 MINS LATER