Well, it just

seems plainly wrong when it had been established that her hymen was intact.

Therefore, it seemed clear that she hadn't had penetrative sex.

You could see where he was coming from at the beginning.

If he thought, well, we never had sex properly and there's this child, so she must have done something with someone else.

But having established that anatomical facts explicitly set out by her doctor, his nocturnal fumblings must have been the reason.

This seems much more like a sort of anti-woman, free this man from this terrible situation result than anything that's based on fact.

Do you think that women today get a fair deal in the divorce courts?

Ayesha Vardag, known as the Queen of the Divorce Lawyers.

It's always better for everyone if it can be resolved without going to court, there's no doubt about that.

People's stories are what makes this field of law so compelling.

This is making me think of the Elizabeth Hurley safety pin dress.

I completely agree.

I looked at that and I thought, "That dress."