That is my point of view.

I agree, we can call it, I am not against the use of partyocracy either.

It is true that by the practical definition that I make of democratic systems, I do believe that it enters into the different categories of democracies, especially because there are two types of classification of systems that many times go through a more pragmatic classification and another through a more purely theoretical classification.

I usually stick more to pragmatism, Because if we don't start having a lot of problems in defining what something is and we end up in this kind of metaphysical questions of, well, this is a triangle, only if it has these characteristics.

And then the most triangular triangle you've ever seen in your life is not because it's not perfect.

And then I, in that sense, I do believe that the question of democracy and the difficulty of democracy is precisely that of the way in which it has been devaluing in the West, especially as a result of what you are talking about, of the influence that money has on power relations.

has led, on the one hand, to the concentration of power, which mainly resides in a bureaucratic class and in another economic class, and to the citizens who sometimes choose more power.

We have even been talking about of pensions but maybe it's okay that you give some argument in favor of your system that you can also debate them and then we will move on to the immigration block that will give little time to develop it but hey at least ask one or