But why can't science in time develop the ability to see the things that you think it can't see and therefore is inherently limited?

It's not the right tool.

The scientific method is based on the observation of physical realities.

I mean, sure, there's room for creativity, there's room for imagination when you come up with the theories to explain those things, but ultimately, even those theories, to be scientific, have to be tested against the physical observations again.

And that, that's not to say there's anything wrong with science.

It does its job perfectly.

It's just that it can't be the only thing that we use.

What does it say about AI and consciousness? Can AI, which is the, you know, processing of information, if it gets sufficiently complex, at what point does AI become conscious?