Yes.

It is.

Um, so zero point eight percent GDP growth compared to the previous quarter.

Uh, so look, the quarterly number at the lower end of the range of forecasts, but that actually wasn't the story.

The real story is the series of, of revisions to previous quarters that has lifted the annual number well above expectations.

So the annual change, uh, the March quarter compared to the March quarter a year ago, one and a half percent above market expectations.

You get-- So the December quarter, that was revised from zero point two to zero point five.

What'd you make of that?

Uh, could you tease out your delegation argument and how that has-- the impact that has on preemption?

Y- yes, I can, Justice Thomas.

I think a good example would be imagine if the EPA had promulgated a notice and comment rule.

It went through an entirely formal process that in the Chevron regime would have unquestionably satisfied Mead, saying, "Roundup is perfectly safe.

There's nothing wrong with glyphosate.

If you put any type of warning on glyphosate, we, the EPA, determine that that would be misbranded." In the old regime, I think you could say we're gonna engage the fiction that Congress intended to delegate that power to EPA.

We don't need some source of text saying that they can do that.

Is that your understanding as well?