We've got the

M1 running through the constituency.

We've got the M42.

Yeah? Yeah.

We've got the new A50.

We've got the new A453 jewelled.

We've got really good communication links.

you know,

Please fill us in, Andrew.

Well, tomorrow is a sitting day.

We don't normally sit on a Friday, but it's private members' bills.

And I'm actually pleased to say that Christopher Chope, Conservative MP for Christchurch, he secured a large number of private members' bills.

So it's basically his day.

And several of them are around the issue of vaccine harms and compensation.

And I'm hoping to be able to take part in those debates as well and give Chris a lot of support.

Why is this the first parliamentary debate on the matter surely this should be the top of the government's agenda

Here are just a few clips.

I mean, why do we need politics? I, I thought of-- I said this to David Cameron and Osborne in 2011.

I'd only been elected a year.

They're supposed to be this, these great politicians.

I, I di- I was pretty much asleep at the time, but I said to them, "Why do we need this politics? What if we just make good policies that make the lives of the people better? You know, they're happier.

Standard of living rising.

Children got better prospects for the next generation.

Yep, yeah.

In your opinion, Andrew, and from afar in the UK looking on at New Zealand, why do you think this is quite a seminal case, quite an important case for the whole world?

Well, it's because it's going to send out a message to people who become privy to information which the public are unaware of, which could shed light on issues that the government is their government is doing.

I mean, clearly, the New Zealand government do not want Barry Young classed as a whistleblower to get protections because.

Barry only went public with this information that he was aware of about the clusters of deaths around the vaccines because, obviously, it was being suppressed from the public.

And you can't have informed consent about vaccination unless you know all the facts.

The government clearly knew all the facts.

They were keeping it from the people.

Yes.

It's always those two lies they use.

Absolutely.

The saboteurs.

Yes.

And he was placed initially after being abducted from Mexico on the false pretense of he needed to go into the consulate to get a new passport, where he was arrested and then put on an airplane to Frankfurt and then put in prison.

And I mean, he spent six months in solitary confinement in manacles for a suspected charge of embezzlement.

I mean, it's as ludicrous as Tommy Robinson going to prison for signing a mortgage declaration, which turned out for his brother-in-law or a close relative who turned out that he slightly inflated his salary to get a bigger mortgage.

Good grief.

Andrew, your reaction to Starmer finally leaving.

Well, it was inevitable that he'd have to go after the Makerfield by-election, which was actually a by-election, probably the most high-profile by-election of our lifetime.

And the majority of the parties there, their aim was to get rid of Starmer.

Well, the fact is that, uh, Andy Burnham enjoyed an increased majority for himself and the Labour Party on the basis that he was the only one who could deliver it, and he's delivered it in, in record time.

For all the bowl and bluster of Starmer, he was going to fight on and fight on, uh, when he saw the political inevitability, there was no way he was going to go into a leadership competition with Andy Burnham because Starmer would've been humiliated.

He is the most, uh, hated, despised prime minister I can ever remember, and, and, and not without cause.

But we have to remember that this is the seventh prime minister we've gone through in the UK in the last decade.

Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer, Burnham." Andrew Bridgen, is the worry that we are now Italy? The disunited kingdom, as I call it, is completely ungovernable, no matter who is in charge, which means the globalists are really running the show.

So what have your impressions been over time and how have you felt that momentum has been gathering?

The first time up here, some people had never heard of Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain, but that's not the case today.

I think the vote's consolidating.

We've got more activists out on the ground than all the other parties put together.

And the momentum is with Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain.

And the great thing about Makerfield is almost half, 49% of the electorate didn't bother to vote at the last election.

I think Restore Britain, with their unique offering, is the only party that can actually appeal to 100% of the potential electorate, especially those people who've given up with the mainstream parties.

So what have you made of how they've been attacking Restore and, you know, the division that they've been trying to sow and doubt that they've been trying to cast in the electorate? The

there would be a deep imbalance.

So, so, so the conclusion is that, that Judge Burgess in Bristol Crown Court did everything within his power to, uh, undermine Dale's case and to ensure that the jury would find him guilty.

Um, however, the great British institution of jury trials, I'm very pleased to announce that the jury found him not guilty.

And that says to me that whatever the establishment say, the judiciary, or, or our politicians, the majority of the public know that the COVID vaccines have caused a large number of deaths and injuries, and there's nothing that the establishment can do about that now.

And this is another reason why the UK, that the current Labor government are seeking to get rid of jury trials, because they want these hearings, they want all hearings in front of politicized judges, and there's no doubt, there's no doubt in anyone's mind, had, had the jury not been present and the decision been down to Judge Burgess, Dale Vincent would've been found guilty and would've been going to prison.

[laughs] What does this say about jury trials?

Well, you know, that's why, I mean, that's why authoritarian governments would seek to, um, get rid of jury trials, um, the main institution of the British justice system that we've, um, w- we've transferred around the world, um, and get it into the hands of politicized judges because, um, there's no doubt that, that, um, there would have been a different verdict from the judge, um, because that's what the establishment wanted.

And, and once you've got that, um, there will be no access to justice, uh, in, in, in this, in this country.

So it was an unbelievable victory.

Well, seeing that was what was hoped for and seeing the number of volunteers that turned out, that was what delivered.

I mean, it was just proving the method.

The method works.

It worked in Great Yarmouth to great effect.

And there were some good candidates.

And I had a conversation a week last Saturday, well, two weeks ago with Rupert.

Really?

Really?

They didn't want to have to fix the election.

That was the last resort.

'Cause that's risky.

That's a risky game.

So yeah, I was intimidated not to stand.

I was offered inducements not to stand.

And he gave into them?

And this is just a problem of their own making.

I must admit, at the meeting point, which was a big pub up in Makerfield, There was a couple of gentlemen came in, and they came to me, and I said, are you with Restore? And they looked very sheepish, and they were actually, said, no, we're with you, Andrew, with you all the way, ultimately, but not at the moment.

I said, well, what does that mean? They said, oh, we're actually in reform.

They'd come to spy.

They look glum because, I mean, it's just hundreds and hundreds of

Farage didn't mind splitting the right.

There's no way.

That's what he was brought in for.

Summarise that Post Office scandal, just for the few that don't actually know it, very briefly.

Okay.

Michael and Susan Rudkin, who were, you know, he was the Chairman of the Sub-Postmasters Federation.

Well, he was representing all the sub-postmasters.

He'd been invited down to Bracknell, where Horizon, that's Fujitsu's headquarters, he thinks that they mistook him for somebody else.

When he got in the building, they showed him all around, and then they took him down to what they called the boiler room, and there were loads of IT engineers down there tapping away on terminals.

And he couldn't help but notice they were running Horizon.

We've also got a hell of a lot of politicians that are objecting to Rupert's rape inquiry.

Are you saying Agenda 2030 is a real thing?

If you look (laughs).

It's a real thing, and if you look on, you look on the government's website (laughs), it says, it says, uh, "We remain aligned to Agenda 2030." But no one ever, no one ever, we never debated it in Parliament.

No one ever talks about it.

It's just there in the background, and all the policies are taking us that way.

So, uh, if you sign up for digital ID, if you say yes to digital ID, I fear you'll never be able to say no to the government again.

And whether people are still...

What are you referring to? What does that mean, what you're referring to? I don't understand.