Listener sentiment
Women and Crime continues to earn strong loyalty from its core audience, with listeners repeatedly praising the hosts' criminology expertise, theoretical analysis, and respectful, non-sensational treatment of victims — many call it the smartest true crime podcast they follow. Two long-running frictions persist and have sharpened slightly in the most recent weeks: a vocal group of long-time listeners is frustrated by the heavy volume of "Reconsidered" revisited-case episodes, which they view as filler with little new information, and complaints about ad load — long mid-episode breaks that some say dominate the show — recur across both positive and negative reviews. A recurring critique of the hosts' dynamic, namely frequent interruptions and talking over each other, resurfaced in the latest ratings after fading over the summer. Newer criticism has also clustered around recent case coverage, with several reviewers arguing the hosts were too credulous in the Clancy case and failed to consider alternative theories or unanswered evidentiary questions, echoing earlier pushback on their Karen Read and Amanda Knox takes. Overall sentiment remains solidly positive, but the pattern of editorial pushback on specific high-profile cases is a growing, if secondary, thread.
Apple4.4 · 607
Summary generated Oct 9, 2026
