Housing's Cruel Musical Chairs
Next, subsidies as a cruel children's game.
Fran QuigleyHost
Jack QuigleyGuest
So can I ask a simple question that may seem obvious? So obviously, if there's a housing shortage, increasing supply seems to be like that would be an easy fix.

What about the wages for people that are actually affording these places? I mean, is building 100,000 new units at the same price going to make a difference if people can't afford that? Yeah, it will make a

So what it will do is make it, it will have the effect of more supply in the market, should lower the cost a little bit for market rate housing that is provided by for-profit landlords, if we're talking about renting.

And that, for instance, the average rental price in our hometown of Indianapolis, which is relatively cheap compared to other metropolitan areas, is about $1,200 a month for a one-bedroom.

And maybe a for-profit landlord, if there's a lot of supply out there and they've got to compete a little bit more, they could lower that price to, you know, maybe they lower it a couple hundred bucks a month.

But they can't lower it all the way down to the level that's affordable for the very poor people because then they can't pay their own expenses.

But for the folks we see in eviction court, folks we see who are on the streets, people who are sleeping in their cars, et cetera, they're in need of subsidized housing.

But there's one of the real deans of housing policy in the United States is a guy named Alan Malick, and he wrote a piece, an article back in 2019, and I think his title said it exactly right.

Rents will only go so low no matter how much we build because for-profit landlords are not going to be able to provide rents.

And when we have folks, which we have, we talked about it in last week's episode with Steven Nunez of the Roosevelt Institute.

There's millions of people in this country who are living with disabilities and their entire monthly income is a thousand dollars a month.

For them, the recommended amount that we all should be paying for housing is like 30% of our income.

There's no for-profit landlord in the country who is going to rent out a home or a unit for $300.

So can I ask a simple question that may seem obvious? So obviously, if there's a housing shortage, increasing supply seems to be like that would be an easy fix.

What about the wages for people that are actually affording these places? I mean, is building 100,000 new units at the same price going to make a difference if people can't afford that? Yeah, it will make a

So what it will do is make it, it will have the effect of more supply in the market, should lower the cost a little bit for market rate housing that is provided by for-profit landlords, if we're talking about renting.

And that, for instance, the average rental price in our hometown of Indianapolis, which is relatively cheap compared to other metropolitan areas, is about $1,200 a month for a one-bedroom.

And maybe a for-profit landlord, if there's a lot of supply out there and they've got to compete a little bit more, they could lower that price to, you know, maybe they lower it a couple hundred bucks a month.

But they can't lower it all the way down to the level that's affordable for the very poor people because then they can't pay their own expenses.

But for the folks we see in eviction court, folks we see who are on the streets, people who are sleeping in their cars, et cetera, they're in need of subsidized housing.

But there's one of the real deans of housing policy in the United States is a guy named Alan Malick, and he wrote a piece, an article back in 2019, and I think his title said it exactly right.

Rents will only go so low no matter how much we build because for-profit landlords are not going to be able to provide rents.

And when we have folks, which we have, we talked about it in last week's episode with Steven Nunez of the Roosevelt Institute.

There's millions of people in this country who are living with disabilities and their entire monthly income is a thousand dollars a month.

For them, the recommended amount that we all should be paying for housing is like 30% of our income.

There's no for-profit landlord in the country who is going to rent out a home or a unit for $300.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 5
Housing's Cruel Musical Chairs
Next, subsidies as a cruel children's game.
Why Supply Alone Fails
First, the housing supply versus demand dilemma.
Case for New Public Housing
Then, imagining public housing done right again.
+2 more clips · 4 min 14 sec of audio in all
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 5 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 10 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.