Listener sentiment
Recent ratings for The Trial of Lucy Letby are sharply polarized, and the fault line runs directly through the question of journalistic bias. On one side, a substantial group of listeners praise hosts Liz Hull and Caroline Cheetham for thorough, accessible court reporting, crediting them with having attended the entire trial and presenting complex medical evidence in a way the general public can follow; these reviewers view the podcast as a reliable counterweight to what they see as fringe conspiracy theories about the conviction. On the other side, an equally vocal contingent argues the hosts predetermined Letby's guilt from the outset, dismiss expert witnesses who question the safety of the conviction, and treat skeptical guests with condescension — several reviewers describe a specific interview with a medical expert as emblematic of this pattern. This divide mirrors the broader public debate around the case itself, with negative reviewers increasingly referencing emerging expert challenges to the evidence and questioning whether the podcast's coverage will age well. Beyond the bias debate, a smaller number of listeners raise production complaints — repetitive music, scripted-sounding delivery, mispronounced words, overly long introductions, and frustration over a sudden shift to a paid subscription model. A few also note that updates became sporadic as the hosts moved on to other projects.
Apple2.9 · 69
Summary generated Sep 16, 2026
