Aug 26, 2026 · 21 min · 9 segments
Meta Platforms settled with 51 state and territorial attorneys general at 6am PT this morning — about an hour after I’d published a vast think piece about what I thought the next six weeks could hold…
And I have to tell you, this settlement, I'm trying to be objective and journalistic about it, but it is really upsetting to me, I have to say.
I was at the very least imagining that as a society, we've been building up a, a mountain of evidence that would change, as I've tried to articulate here many, many times, our attitude in the United States around harm from believing that there's only such a thing as financial harm and physical harm to believing in behavioral harm, understanding that there is such a thing as changing how people behave at scale through these platforms in ways that can be very harmful to them.
And this case, in my view, was going to be a way of really establishing that, enshrining that as precedent in law.
And instead, because of the nature of a settlement, the two years of work the states put into assembling all this stuff, all the discovery that we got, which was invaluable to me as a reporter and to people like me, all that stuff can't be used in future.
But before I get into all of this, I'm gonna rant a little bit about it in a, in, in a while and tell you all the implications about it, what it means for the states, how it compares to other historical settlements, and some very interesting caveats here that I think are worth understanding.
Read the full transcript.
Create an account to read the whole episode, search across every transcript, and follow the shows you care about.
And I have to tell you, this settlement, I'm trying to be objective and journalistic about it, but it is really upsetting to me, I have to say.
I was at the very least imagining that as a society, we've been building up a, a mountain of evidence that would change, as I've tried to articulate here many, many times, our attitude in the United States around harm from believing that there's only such a thing as financial harm and physical harm to believing in behavioral harm, understanding that there is such a thing as changing how people behave at scale through these platforms in ways that can be very harmful to them.
And this case, in my view, was going to be a way of really establishing that, enshrining that as precedent in law.
And instead, because of the nature of a settlement, the two years of work the states put into assembling all this stuff, all the discovery that we got, which was invaluable to me as a reporter and to people like me, all that stuff can't be used in future.
But before I get into all of this, I'm gonna rant a little bit about it in a, in, in a while and tell you all the implications about it, what it means for the states, how it compares to other historical settlements, and some very interesting caveats here that I think are worth understanding.